#2 2008-04-09 18:23:43
I've heard about the "Yoo Memo," but had not seen so much detail.
It does make the mind ache.
I'm still hoping that before I die, I'll get to see a bunch of these people hanged for treason.
Offline
#3 2008-04-09 18:31:59
George Orr wrote:
hanged for treason
None of the ones you want hung are going to get close. Money/power wins again.
Last edited by MSG Tripps (2008-04-09 18:39:08)
Offline
#4 2008-04-09 18:50:23
MSG Tripps wrote:
George Orr wrote:
hanged for treason
None of the ones you want hung are going to get close.
Yeah, I know...But I can dream.
Maybe one or two of 'em will take the honorable way out and eat a barrel. [edit] And then I can look at the pictures on ogrish.
Last edited by George Orr (2008-04-09 18:50:55)
Offline
#5 2008-04-09 18:58:32
George Orr wrote:
But I can dream....
Kind of like my ole girl.
For the record I am not married. Illinois has no common law deal, so I have been with the same women for over 12 years with out marriage. Like we care.
Offline
#6 2008-04-09 20:43:12
It repeats an assertion in another controversial Yoo memo that an interrogation tactic cannot be considered torture unless it would result in "death, organ failure or serious impairment of bodily functions."
That's just counterproductive, as any chink would know...
Yoo, who is now a law professor at the University of California at Berkeley, also uses footnotes to effectively dismiss the Fourth and Fifth amendments to the Constitution, arguing that protections against unreasonable search and seizure and guarantees of due process either do not apply or are irrelevant in a time of war. He frequently cites his previous legal opinions to bolster his case.
Berkeley, makes sense....
Offline
#7 2008-04-09 23:45:51
George Orr wrote:
I'm still hoping that before I die, I'll get to see a bunch of these people hanged for treason.
Some of these scum will go to their just reward, money or not. All the king's horses and all the king's men can not protect them, not with the blood of hundreds of thousands on their hands. Pray they don't live to see it, that their eyes get poked out first.
Offline
#8 2008-04-10 00:01:37
choad wrote:
just reward
There is/are no "just reward"(s). Who the fuck are you trying to fool?
Offline
#9 2008-04-10 00:54:37
MSG Tripps wrote:
There is/are no "just reward"(s). Who the fuck are you trying to fool?
Myself.
Offline
#10 2008-04-10 00:58:01
MSG Tripps wrote:
choad wrote:
just reward
There is/are no "just reward"(s). Who the fuck are you trying to fool?
Well, there could be. Hear me out: a just punishment for those who give the big "f-u" to the Constitution, the Geneva Conventions, and all-around human decency:
Find an empty spot in one of the square states where no one lives.
Dig out a cubical pit, 100 feet on a side. Line it 3 feet thick with concrete and rebar.
Put a cover over it. In the middle of the cover, a heavy blast-proof door.
After conviction and rejection of 3 appeals, lu53r is to be taken to The Pit and pushed in. Then ignored. The first few should die fairly quickly, forming a limited food supply for those who follow.
A just punishment, with minimal upkeep requirements. And it's technically not the death penalty, so even pantywaists like Roman Catholics and jesuslovespegging should be able to support it.
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#11 2008-04-10 01:01:18
whiskytangofoxtrot wrote:
A just punishment, with minimal upkeep requirements. And it's technically not the death penalty, so even pantywaists like Roman Catholics and jesuslovespegging should be able to support it.
Technically not the death penalty my ass.
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#12 2008-04-10 01:03:46
I dream that 2 of these are set up on the Mall in Washington... I dream that they start in the Judiciary Bringing in Yoo, Asscroft, Gonzalez etc., then work their way through the Pentagon, CIA, FBI ad nauseum, then meander through both houses, then the Supreme Court, finalizing with the Executive Branch. Both Parties. No Mercy.
Offline
#13 2008-04-10 01:06:28
Give it up boys and or girls.
There ain't no just's anything.
CYA and take care of your own.
Don't kid yourselfs
Offline
#14 2008-04-10 01:11:00
Dmtdust wrote:
I dream that 2 of these are set up on the Mall in Washington... I dream that they start in the Judiciary Bringing in Yoo, Asscroft, Gonzalez etc., then work their way through the Pentagon, CIA, FBI ad nauseum, then meander through both houses, then the Supreme Court, finalizing with the Executive Branch. Both Parties. No Mercy.
Wow. That's such a beautiful dream. /sniffle
I'll bring my drill with a grinding wheel to keep the blades sharp. Wouldn't want the party to slow down.
Offline
#15 2008-04-10 01:49:23
Dmtdust wrote:
I dream that 2 of these are set up on the Mall in Washington... I dream that they start in the Judiciary Bringing in Yoo, Asscroft, Gonzalez etc., then work their way through the Pentagon, CIA, FBI ad nauseum, then meander through both houses, then the Supreme Court, finalizing with the Executive Branch. Both Parties. No Mercy.
...ok, see, that's a death penalty I could get behind.
Would there be state-fair style concessions booths at this event? Cotton candy? Funnel cakes? Deep fried [whatever] on a stick?
Last edited by jesusluvspegging (2008-04-10 01:51:05)
Offline
#16 2008-04-10 01:51:30
You know, sadly, I give in to the same fantasies. I keep hoping the Dems will grow some balls and open investigations into all the shit Bush and his cronies have pulled, and I have this ongoing fantasy of someone being pissed off enough to take a number of them out.
I'm furious and frustrated and, pretty much, resigned. Which, of course, just plays into their hands.
As Dhal said: Shit.
Offline
#17 2008-04-10 01:57:16
You know, there are some on line plans for The Maiden... BTW... can we Waterboard Gonzalez and Crew first?
Concessions?? Hell Yeah!
Last edited by Dmtdust (2008-04-10 01:59:11)
Offline
#18 2008-04-10 02:28:32
Dmtdust wrote:
You know, there are some on line plans for The Maiden... BTW... can we Waterboard Gonzalez and Crew first?
Concessions?? Hell Yeah!
I'll run the henna titty tattoos booth.
Offline
#19 2008-04-10 02:32:07
Taint wrote:
pretty much, resigned.
Arkansas, you are bullshitting.
Offline
#20 2008-04-10 07:50:16
it's technically not the death penalty
How could they object to their own rationale, after all? It's their only contribution to the nation they profess to love so very much.
You could even skip the waterboarding (though I'd rather not). I'd be satisfied to see all of them subjected to stress positions and sleep deprivation, starting with Rumsfeld and Cheney, please.
Offline
#21 2008-04-10 13:47:55
The beauty of their legal opinions is that we don't even actually have to be in a war for the President to use his "war-time powers", and therefore any and all rights can be waived, and the beauty part is that he can then pass on that power to whoever he wants! There's no mention of the Vice President having any such powers, but by virtue of the Magic President theory he just waves his wand, and viola!
Offline
#23 2008-04-10 15:19:59
Taint wrote:
Tojo wrote:
...but by virtue of the Magic President theory he just waves his wand, and viola!
Exactly. Fiddling while your country burns is so old-school.
/me backs away slowly, then runs
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#24 2008-04-10 19:53:45
tojo2000 wrote:
Exactly. Fiddling while your country burns is so old-school.
Even Shrub knows that. He was playing his guitar while New Orleans was drowning.
Offline
#26 2008-04-11 04:27:59
Rense. Where Word 97 is still a good tool for making web pages.
Offline
#27 2008-04-11 08:14:20
tojo2000 wrote:
Rense. Where Word 97 is still a good tool for making web pages.
OK, try here you nitpicking fuck. Take your pick from the links. I guess you must be a Web 2.0 guru.
I hate web browsers. They let cretins get online. Tim Berners Lee should be crucified. He's turned an idyllic, eclectic and civilised playground into an open sewer for the masses where people who have nothing to say can whine about how you build your HTML.
Felch
Offline
#28 2008-04-11 08:26:09
felch wrote:
I hate web browsers. They let cretins get online. Tim Berners Lee should be crucified. He's turned an idyllic, eclectic and civilised playground into an open sewer for the masses where people who have nothing to say can whine about how you build your HTML.
Felch
To which evil social system does the "Defining Characteristic" belong where the ellite restrict access to the means of comminication and free expression? Jealously gurding control of the mass media for only those who meet their approval?
Last edited by Johnny_Rotten (2008-04-11 08:29:41)
Offline
#29 2008-04-11 09:12:06
Johnny_Rotten wrote:
comminication and free expression?
Communication and free expression ? I wish. Its just noise and flatus.
LOL. BRB.
Felch
Offline
#30 2008-04-11 16:30:52
felch wrote:
tojo2000 wrote:
Rense. Where Word 97 is still a good tool for making web pages.
OK, try here you nitpicking fuck. Take your pick from the links. I guess you must be a Web 2.0 guru.
I hate web browsers. They let cretins get online. Tim Berners Lee should be crucified. He's turned an idyllic, eclectic and civilised playground into an open sewer for the masses where people who have nothing to say can whine about how you build your HTML.
Felch
Oh, relax, for God's sake.
P.S. For the record, I think anyone who uses the phrase "Web 2.0" should be defenestrated, post-haste.
Offline
#31 2008-04-11 16:56:00
Ah defenestration,
The way a civilised society brings the powers upon high back down to earth.
Offline
#33 2008-04-11 18:37:44
felch wrote:
Tim Berners Lee should be crucified. He's turned an idyllic, eclectic and civilised playground into an open sewer for the masses where people who have nothing to say can whine about how you build your HTML.
Felch
Wait just a minute! Al Gore invented the World Wide Web! If there is some doubt about who really invented the Internet, Al and Tim should settle the issue via a bitchslap match.
Offline
#34 2008-04-11 22:43:49
"...protections against unreasonable search and seizure and guarantees of due process either do not apply or are irrelevant in a time of war. "
1984 arrives roughly 20 years late.
Offline
#35 2008-04-12 00:46:27
From the hearing with Mukasey today:
Mr. Mukasey, who became attorney general in November, faced sometimes contentious questioning on the memorandum on Thursday during the Senate hearing, which was supposed to focus on the Justice Department’s 2009 budget.
Senator Dianne Feinstein, Democrat of California, repeatedly pressed Mr. Mukasey to say whether Mr. Yoo’s October 2001 memorandum was still in effect. “Is this memo in force — that the Fourth Amendment does not apply to the domestic military?” she asked.
Mr. Mukasey did not answer directly, saying, “The principle that the Fourth Amendment doesn’t apply in wartime is not in force.”
Mrs. Feinstein tried again: “Is the Fourth Amendment today applicable to domestic military operations.”
Mr. Mukasey again declined to answer directly, saying, “I don’t know of any military operations being carried out today.”
Clearly flustered with the attorney general, Mrs. Feinstein then said, “I’m asking you a question. That’s not the answer. The question is, Does it apply?”
Mr. Mukasey again responded that he was unaware of any domestic military operations.
She tried one last time: “You’re not answering my question. Is this memo binding today?”
Mr. Mukasey replied with a broader answer, that the Fourth Amendment applied in wartime or in peacetime. “It applies across the board,” he said.
That appeared to satisfy the senator. “Thank you very much,” she said. “That’s what I wanted to know.”
Somehow I'm not convinced.
Last edited by tojo2000 (2008-04-12 00:47:20)
Offline
#36 2008-04-12 12:03:29
I don’t know of any military operations being carried out today.
Delusional fuck...
Offline