I wish they could've gotten a conviction for that trashy little bitch, but apparently the prosecution wasn't up to it.

Not that it matters.  Lil' Caylee was doomed from the instant she was conceived, whether she got to grow up or not.

Last edited by George Orr (2011-07-05 20:46:52)

I really don't care.  The bitch killed her daughter; nobody cared enough about the child to remove her from her egg donor/killer's custody.  This indicates Caylee didn't have a bright and shining future ahead of her anyway.

I don't care enough to spend the fraction of a penny for the electricity to make this meaningless gesture!

Nancy Grace doesn't give a shit about Caylee either.  Her only interest in the Murdered White Females she features on her show is how much she can use them for to increase her wealth.

Somebody who gives a shit about Caylee!

It sure helps me NOT think about the thousands of other little girls who were abused, killed or abandoned by their mothers during the last few months. Yay!

I hope she takes Vivid Videos offer... the collective irony of thousands spilling their seed to this woman would be enough to create the black hole the Large Hadron Collider could not.

phreddy wrote:

...People these days have no idea about how to weigh competing arguments.  Well sure, all the evidence points to the bitch killing her daughter, but she could have been abducted by space aliens.  There is that possibility.  Fucking idiots.

The prosecution didn't do their job, full stop.  The prosecution apparently did not spend any time addressing motive, or how the child might have been killed.

"We Were Sick to Our Stomach to Get That Verdict"

I've been on two juries--one Federal drug-conspiracy trial and one DWI (no murders, and they were short trials)--and in both instances the jury members felt their responsibility very keenly and we all did our very best to act within the law and do the Right Thing. 
In both cases we did not bring back guilty verdicts on the most serious charge.  In both cases it was because the prosecution did not do their job of proving guilt.

phreddy wrote:

my attorney friends

This may appear oxymoronic in your mirror.

I couldn’t care less about Caylee, but Casey gives me a boner.  I’d feel safe hooking up with her.  If I accidentally got her pregnant, I know she’d take care of it.

choad wrote:

As apparently the only person in the English speaking world who doesn't own a tv or have a fucking clue what this lurid drama is about, would someone please link to original crime?

Well, it appears this hot young mother killed her 2 year old daughter, dumped the body in the swamp and went on a month long party'ing spree.  The body decomposed so badly means of death could not be proven despite the duct-tape over mouth, nose and eyes.

It get's better in that apparently the young mother, whilst growing up, was repeatedly tapped by father and brother.  The family stuck up for her in the end in one of the greatest examples of child-enablement ever seen by mankind.


A shit show from the moment of the young mothers inception (not to mention the childs).

Roger_That wrote:

Who cares?????????

I don't.

phoQ wrote:

http://i.imgur.com/S2vCb.jpghttp://i.imgur.com/aAbYX.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/38TUl.jpg

I couldn’t care less about Caylee, but Casey gives me a boner.  I’d feel safe hooking up with her.  If I accidentally got her pregnant, I know she’d take care of it.

That's exactly how I feel. Very well put.

phreddy wrote:

Yes, those were the reasons the jury gave for not convicting her.  However, my attorney friends tell me that determining motive and method of death are not required for a guilty verdict.  Headkicker, do you want to weigh in here?

It was a circumstantial case.  Almost every case is circumstantial unless there is an eyewitness (which might be flawed) or DNA (which could be present for some other reason including contamination of the sample).

They could have convicted on the evidence they were given if it was more likely than not that Caylee died as a result of a crime committed by Casey.  Aladdin got it right.  The Defense was able to make the family the focus of the case.  The fact that they had 33 days of testimony and only deliberated for 10 hours is very telling.  Also, the alternate juror said that he believed Caylee died in some sort of horrific accident (no evidence for that) and that the father was lying.

This reminds me of the Boston nanny case...nice white girl shakes a baby to death and gets off because it could have been something else;  also reminds me of the Danielle Van Damme case where the Defendant was convicted (he was a male), but the Defense claimed the child was killed by someone else because the parents were swingers and had strange people in and out of their house --- even though they knew their client was guilty because he had offered to show them the location of the body in exchange for  plea.  In the Van Damme case it didn't work.

The jurors here, in my opinion, were just lazy.  They decided early on that the white trash family was full of scumbags and that they wanted to feel sorry for Casey.  They really did not deliberate at all because their minds were already made up.

phreddy wrote:

This just in.  Even Gawd thinks she's guilty.

A tall tree in the same area where Caylee Marie Anthony's remains were found was struck by lightning this afternoon — just hours after her mother learned she would be released from jail next week.

Soooo basically god has embarassingly bad aim.

I really don't know anything about this mess, and I really don't care, but everyone else is posting so I just want to get in on the activity, too.

BRB...going out with my slingshot...

Taint wrote:

I really don't know anything about this mess, and I really don't care, but everyone else is posting so I just want to get in on the activity, too.

Good for you, Taint! You must have been paying attention to the man behind the curtain.