Headline is "Transsexual golfers prove drivers for change".

Seems they have donated their drivers in their quest for "change".

But are they lesbians? Do they like women?

Baggers has some nice bags, but a bad case of giraffe neck. And Lawless didn't escape the ugly by switching teams, that's for sure. When is the last time you saw a pro golfer with a neck as thick as my thigh?

They whacked their balls so they could go out and whack their balls.
Welcome to the LGBTPGA.

Last edited by Tall Paul (2011-02-10 02:13:48)

It's still just cheating to win.

phreddy wrote:

I enjoy watching the evolution of PC monickers.  Apparently "transexual" is now out and they are "transitioned" women.

Thank Goddess that adadictomy is a legitimate medical term!

The acceptance of M2F transsexuals into women's sports is a bad, bad idea.

It has been shown time and time again that there is no shortage of athletes that will stop at nothing for a win.  Drugs, body modification, whatever they can get away with.

It does not take a really big leap of imagination to imagine, say, a 1-handicap golfer on the man's circuit who also has a bit of an excessive desire to finally get the brass ring getting his willy cut off, putting on a dress and changing his name to Denise.

Women's basketball being played by Kobe Bryant in drag?  Women's track events run by Carla Lewis?  It's wrong and these "women" damn well know it.

It's actually regular women that serve to lose the most.  There's probably not many competitive sports where an F2M transsexual would have an advantage (swimming, perhaps, maybe some others).  But there are PLENTY of sports where 25-40 years of growing up male would serve well if you could decide to be a woman and compete with the women.

Hell, if you can just decide to change and compete, why separate sports at all.  Why not just make women compete against men in EVERY sport.  Sure, synchronized swimming would be pretty different, Olympic boxing could become more interesting, and it would shut those ski-jumping bitches in Vancouver.  Of course, women wouldn't get many medals.  Can you imagine the Canadian women's hockey team against the US championship mens team?

LGBT sympathizers will, when presented with this argument, trot out the "what about intersex people" canard.  They do have a point.  There is a tiny portion of the population born with ambiguous gender (XXY chromosome pattern, for example).  But those are rare and their situation really doesn't apply to this.

It seems straightforward enough to me... for the purposes of competitive sports, if you have the XY chromosome pattern you are a man and if you have XX you are a woman.  If you're something else, well, then that gets handled on a case-by-case basis.

fnord wrote:

I've always preferred the term "tranny mental case" when referring to them.  Any man who would want to have his dick sliced off has some serious mental issues.

The majority, who already believe men frolicking with men is abnormal, probably don't make that distinction, you think?

Jacqie Omfg?

I used to work as the coat-check guy at a gay bar right outside the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard in Hampton Roads. (Owned and staffed almost entirely by straights to minimize the tom foolery) On pageant nights we got all kinds of cross dressers, pre and post op trannies, fag hags, leather dykes, bears, twinks, log cabin types, the whole gamut. It wasn't until I worked there that I even knew you could buy a 4" stiletto heel in a size 13.

fnordie-pie wrote:

Why these individuals ignore the material they have to work with, and try to present an image of femininity is a mystery to me.

Because many have so little to work with in the first place. The only thing worse than a guy getting surgery to look like a hot chick is one who gets surgery to look like a hot guy.

We all know that when you close your eyes and imagine standing in front of a mirror, who you see is more Elle MacPherson than who you really are, right?