#1 2009-12-23 17:38:00

Which is more annoying, bombastic or pathetic?

Offline

 

#2 2009-12-23 17:40:24

So, I wasn't around on Cruel for Horse's rein snicker of terror.  Here on HS he's been pretty tame.  Based on this info, I would have to vote "worse."  However, Horse has gained a reputation amongst you people for some reason, so I'm inclined to factor that into My decision making here.

I vote "about the same."

Offline

 

#3 2009-12-23 17:49:00

I liked having Horse around.  We used to sling some epic diatribe at each other.  Understand that I was unemployed and bored at the time, and that I'm probably in the minority.

Offline

 

#4 2009-12-23 17:56:52

opsec wrote:

We used to sling some epic diatribe at each other.

The eloquence he occasionally brought out in a few people was still not worth having him around.

Pale is another matter entirely.  He's erudite, eloquent, and often very funny.  But the moodies, my gracious...All things considered, I'd say his positive qualities outweigh the unfortunately frequent pissy-fits.

Last edited by George Orr (2009-12-23 18:00:08)

Offline

 

#5 2009-12-23 17:57:24

I have an open door policy on all the freaks.

Offline

 

#6 2009-12-23 18:10:31

There's quite a difference in the two.

Horseonovich abused Cruelers, which was enraging, mesmerizing and hysterically funny by turns.

Pale evidently abuses substances, which is just a bore.

Last edited by Montecore (2009-12-23 18:33:40)

Offline

 

#7 2009-12-23 18:17:03

Dmtdust wrote:

I have an open door policy on all the freaks.

I absolutely agree.  Pale and Horse and Lurker and Wilber and the spammers are all welcome here, in My book.

Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.  But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you; That ye may be the children of your Father which is in Heaven: for He maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.

Last edited by jesusluvspegging (2009-12-23 18:21:57)

Offline

 

#8 2009-12-23 18:28:55

In the spirit of Christmas I say stop the judgment of these two icons of tyranny and let them fight it out in MMA cage.

Offline

 

#9 2009-12-23 18:36:04

And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.

They both will come if they wish, but the result may be that we all get smallpox.

Last edited by Fled (2009-12-23 18:37:37)

Offline

 

#10 2009-12-23 18:37:01

I voted "not as bad" but that was before I realized he carpet bombed the entire board. I was actually happy to see him on here this morning. BUT:

You fucking retard, why would you do shit like that? Go back to where ever you were and keep throwing your fucking fit. Every fucking topic on the site??? That is fucktardery by definition.

Isn't there some kind of fucking rule about the carpet bombing? Especially when you don't really have anything to fucking say????

Re- Goddamn- diculous.

Offline

 

#11 2009-12-23 18:54:02

This is like comparing apples and oranges, although either one in excess will give you the shits.  Both of them are intelligent and can be insightful and/or witty.  I suspect if I met them in real life and nobody copped to their activities on HS we would all like each other.  One big difference is where they are at in their lives right now.  Horse seems to have found love and his visits are less annoying because he isn’t as much of a pompous ass as he used to be.  Pale’s life seems to have taken a turn for the worse and he’s self-medicating a lot and lashing out to deal with it.  My vote is a null vote because I can’t make up my mind if one is worse than the other.  In the past I would have said Horse was worse, but because Horse is better behaved these days when he shows up, and Pale has become more annoying in the past year or so it’s more or less a tie.

Offline

 

#12 2009-12-23 18:56:17

I think if one's life has turned for the worse, then suicide should always be considered. That way the board doesn't get polluted with stupid shit.

Offline

 

#13 2009-12-23 19:02:36

Rest easy Bigcat.  Remember Lurker, NYJew, TopPoster, Leatherdruid, et al?  In a perfect world they all committed suicide.

Offline

 

#14 2009-12-23 19:14:31

Montecore wrote:

There's quite a difference in the two.

Horseonovich abused Cruelers, which was enraging, mesmerizing and hysterically funny by turns.

Pale evidently abuses substances, which is just a bore.

I'm with Monte on this one.  Hyuck.

Offline

 

#15 2009-12-23 19:15:28

Bigcat wrote:

I voted "not as bad" but that was before I realized he carpet bombed the entire board. I was actually happy to see him on here this morning. BUT:

You fucking retard, why would you do shit like that? Go back to where ever you were and keep throwing your fucking fit. Every fucking topic on the site??? That is fucktardery by definition.

Isn't there some kind of fucking rule about the carpet bombing? Especially when you don't really have anything to fucking say????

Re- Goddamn- diculous.

This, X2.

Offline

 

#16 2009-12-23 19:16:23

opsec wrote:

Rest easy Bigcat.  Remember Lurker, NYJew, TopPoster, Leatherdruid, et al?  In a perfect world they all committed suicide.

I MISS NYJEW!!!!!!

And TopPoster was Ptah I think.

Offline

 

#17 2009-12-23 19:31:43

Well Duh, of course he was, or wasn't.

Now you have to guess who I used to be.

Offline

 

#18 2009-12-23 19:41:13

Roger_That wrote:

I MISS NYJEW!!!!!!

Actually I do too.  I don't miss some of his sockpuppets.

Roger_That wrote:

And TopPoster was Ptah I think.

Heh, poopkorn :).  Ptah's been away for a while, hope all is well with him.

Offline

 

#19 2009-12-23 20:53:04

NYJew = pALEPHx!

Offline

 

#20 2009-12-23 21:01:05

Fled wrote:

And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.

They both will come if they wish, but the result may be that we all get smallpox.

No, it's only the Words of the Lord that are in red.  Have you never read a Bibble?

Offline

 

#21 2009-12-23 21:32:18

fnord wrote:

NYJew = pALEPHx!

Hmm.  89th and Amsterdam?

Offline

 

#22 2009-12-23 22:10:38

opsec wrote:

Rest easy Bigcat.  Remember Lurker, NYJew, TopPoster, Leatherdruid, et al?  In a perfect world they all committed suicide.

Visions of sugarplums....

Offline

 

#23 2009-12-23 22:41:45

Something compelled me to check out HS today.

I thought it was sentimentality (all those heart-warming Yuletide Yule Logs that we've shared in past).  But finding this thread here, well, dammit all, I am waxing spooky serendipitical.  It's almost like I was summoned, and that kind of fucks with my mind.  OPS -- why the hell did you spell my name that way?  You, of all people...

But I digress (from what, I don't know).  I find it touching that each of you remains to this day so uniquely your self.  Yes, even you, George, with all your bitterness (I love how the others just sort of ignore that portion of you that still holds the rage -- were it not for your unwarranted --and obvious-- hatred, you'd almost be cool sometimes).   Fnordonovich, I would consider it a fucking privilege  to meet you some time.  You've continually brought humor and wit to this place.  Choad, cunt that you are, I read your occasional posts and can't help but like you, too.  Dusty, RT, Monte -- same to you all.  Sorry for all the sentimentality.  I will attack you all later, I promise.  But somehow I can always come back here, see your posts, and be warmed.   

Can someone tell me who it is that BigCat is swatting at (above)?   I can't figure it out.   And who is pALEPHx?  Is he someone in need of a good old fashioned Horsey-style shellacking?  Do tell.

Love You Guys  -- H

Offline

 

#24 2009-12-23 22:47:56

This is the Ouija board posting...  I am sure you and Pale could talk about what first pops up.  In fact, it might be a digression we'd like on video.

Offline

 

#25 2009-12-23 22:57:47

Horse:

pALEPHx is something that flounced in here a bit after the transition from Cruel to High-Street, shrieking and squealing "Hey, look-a-me, I'm a faigehleh and I want everyone here should KNOW."  He also posted photos of his noisome self (six-five, the faggy side of Hebraic - not that that's not a fine line sometimes - and a spoiled-rich-kid pout Paris Hilton would kill for). 

Since, he has taken to posting responses to every fucking topic posted since his previous visit here, which means the forum page is often devoted entirely to his responses to things everyone else forgot six weeks or more ago.  His missives are of varying degrees of coherence, evidently varying according to the quality and quantity accorded him by his preferred dealer.

If you wish to send him packing - but not fudge-packing - you have my blessing.

Offline

 

#26 2009-12-23 23:16:50

Horseonovich wrote:

OPS -- why the hell did you spell my name that way?  You, of all people...

What's scary is that it still summoned you. 

Horseonovich wrote:

Fnordonovich, Choad, Dusty, RT, Monte

You realize that betweem 60% and 80% these people e-hate you.

Horseonovich wrote:

And who is pALEPHx?  Is he someone in need of a good old fashioned Horsey-style shellacking?  Do tell.

You've been away too long.

Offline

 

#27 2009-12-23 23:22:15

Oh Hi Dusty.  Bye, Dusty. 

    Just thought I'd add this little update:  I've briefly reviewed a handful of threads with Pale, etc.,  and maybe one or two exchanges (GO or  Fnord with Px, etc., not to mention a remark to Px by OPS, and one or two other bits).  Not a lot, I know, but I didn't need to see a lot. 

    Pale's your garden variety pseudo-intellectual.  He seems to be out to impress Fnord for some reason (and he does a bad job of trying to mask the fact that he kisses his ass whilst feigning abuse).  It's like he's trying to "do" fnord (no not in that sense ... where's your head at?) -- but only fnord can be fnord.  When Px chimed in on that month-ago thread about the Old South he pretty much gave himself away as a sycophantic fraud trying to hide the fact that he is a sycophantic fraud. 

    I don't like to get into GO stuff any more  --not because I can't --it's just that I find her a bit tedious.  She seems to be infatuated with the guy.  Oh, she'll admonish him alright, but it's all so very precious, isn't it, and laced with her trademark "wanna-be Anglicized" marmish affection (that's never failed to nauseate).  Get a room, you two.  (Although, admittedly, a video-cam discretely placed for such a grand encounter 'twixt withered female flesh and his inadequate "wishes it was black" manhood --or  lack thereof?-- could make for some entertaining moments indeed).  Ah, would that it could be so....

   Bottom line?  Pale needs some GHL nourishment, and to be taken under wing for guidance by my warm and gentle tutelage.  He is like a slightly more sophisticated, male version of Darwinism.  Oh and he gives Attention Whoredom a bad name.  We smell our own, ya see.  The guild would have excommunicated him.

Last edited by Horseonovich (2009-12-23 23:35:24)

Offline

 

#28 2009-12-23 23:29:02

opsec wrote:

Horseonovich wrote:

Fnordonovich, Choad, Dusty, RT, Monte

You realize that betweem 60% and 80% these people e-hate you.

Not a bit of it, old chum.  Choad maybe, but I'll bet not really.  The others mentioned above?  Don't be ridiculous.  Dusty comes close at times, but even he knows the true spirit of the Horse.   RT just pretends to hate me, but when we are IMing off-site, we's just like peas and carrots, we two.

Offline

 

#29 2009-12-23 23:30:08

Montecore wrote:

Horse:

pALEPHx is something that flounced in here a bit after the transition from Cruel to High-Street, shrieking and squealing "Hey, look-a-me, I'm a faigehleh and I want everyone here should KNOW."  He also posted photos of his noisome self (six-five, the faggy side of Hebraic - not that that's not a fine line sometimes - and a spoiled-rich-kid pout Paris Hilton would kill for). 

Since, he has taken to posting responses to every fucking topic posted since his previous visit here, which means the forum page is often devoted entirely to his responses to things everyone else forgot six weeks or more ago.  His missives are of varying degrees of coherence, evidently varying according to the quality and quantity accorded him by his preferred dealer.

If you wish to send him packing - but not fudge-packing - you have my blessing.

Thanks Monte.  Good job getting me up to speed.  By the way, are you still me?  I haven't been keeping up....

Offline

 

#30 2009-12-23 23:30:47

Horseonovich wrote:

Oh and he gives Attention Whoredom a bad name. .

Horse, I never knew you to understate a case before.

pALEPHx puts the "ho" in attention wHOredom.

Offline

 

#31 2009-12-23 23:42:36

Horseonovich wrote:

I haven't been keeping up....

Cialis works quite well for that.

Hearsay, of course...

But to answer your question about whether you're still me, or I'm still you:

I ain't real sure.

Offline

 

#32 2009-12-23 23:45:04

I had a feeling I'd get called on that.  Alas, Horsey Junior is still quite limber, thank you very much.  I realize that I did not need to say that, of course, but it was meant only for you.  And besides, I wouldn't be Horseonovich if I didn't occasionally find some way to make a reference to my manhood.

Offline

 

#33 2009-12-23 23:54:13

Horseonovich wrote:

opsec wrote:

Horseonovich wrote:

Fnordonovich, Choad, Dusty, RT, Monte

You realize that betweem 60% and 80% these people e-hate you.

Not a bit of it, old chum.  Choad maybe, but I'll bet not really.  The others mentioned above?  Don't be ridiculous.  Dusty comes close at times, but even he knows the true spirit of the Horse.   RT just pretends to hate me, but when we are IMing off-site, we's just like peas and carrots, we two.

You were the welcome wagon Horseonovich, when I first hunkered over Cruel, and took my "Funeral Of A Terrorist" Dump... I still have your Horsey medal of approval on some abandoned disk some where.

Don't let em piss on yer leg Old Man, don't let em.

Last edited by Dmtdust (2009-12-24 00:01:20)

Offline

 

#34 2009-12-24 00:00:06

Horseonovich wrote:

I wouldn't be Horseonovich if I didn't occasionally find some way to make a reference to my manhood.

Occasionally?  For a while there, references to the lil' fucker were eating more server space than The New York Times.

Good to razz you again.

Offline

 

#35 2009-12-24 00:01:28

Dmtdust wrote:

You were the welcome wagon Horseonovich, when I first hungered over Cruel, and took my "Funeral Of A Terrorist" Dump... I still have your Horsey medal of approval on some abandoned disk some where.

Don't let em piss on yer leg Old Man, don't let em.

Ah, but dogs will be dogs. 

Say I think you are making me wax reminiscical.  Was your Official Horseonovich Seal of Approval for the "Gunmen Drag Dead Terrorist Through The Streets of DC" post?  The old Gipper's funeral?

Was that you?

Offline

 

#36 2009-12-24 00:03:03

Yes indeed, the Gippers funeral.  Benzie blew a nut... (of course he always lusted after Michael Savage's miniature tools...)

Offline

 

#37 2009-12-24 00:03:31

Montecore wrote:

Horseonovich wrote:

I wouldn't be Horseonovich if I didn't occasionally find some way to make a reference to my manhood.

Occasionally?  For a while there, references to the lil' fucker were eating more server space than The New York Times.

Good to razz you again.

I would have said "and deservedly so"  were it not for the fact that you're exaggeration is almost as big and girthy as my, well, umm, ok drop it.  We'll pay this no lip service tonight, old chum.

Offline

 

#38 2009-12-24 00:06:18

Horseonovich wrote:

We'll pay this no lip service tonight, old chum.

Indeed.

Offline

 

#39 2009-12-24 00:17:13

Odd how Horsey, Montecore and Pale show up as a set. 

Might cause one to wonder if it is only you here on this board who is not a sock puppet.

Offline

 

#40 2009-12-24 00:21:25

Emmeran wrote:

Odd how Horsey, Montecore and Pale show up as a set. 

Might cause one to wonder if it is only you here on this board who is not a sock puppet.

The phenomenon to which you refer is called "time off for the holidays," Emmerdeur.

Offline

 

#41 2009-12-24 01:09:26

Alas all my pretties, but the hour grows late.  All Horsey's little ones should tuck themselves in with visions of sugar plums and
Golden Horsey Love spewing and gushing upon them in asynchronous, pulsating squirts of amber and pearl.   Rest well, pretties, for soon that ruddy-faced man in red will appear, bearing good cheer and presents to those who have been good, be they far or near.   

For now, I must away to my secret Fishkill abode where I will take my respite until once again we can all be together.   My yule log needs tending to. 

To All Good Night.   Let's be sure to all get together tomorrow evening, though.  I plan on drinking shots of Irish Mist, as is traditional in my household on Xmas Eve.  See you all then.  Yee Hee!

Offline

 

#42 2009-12-24 01:38:22

Now do all of you understand why I killfiled/ignored/whatever Tom Colligan when I first came to this board?

Offline

 

#43 2009-12-24 02:30:19

Horseonovich wrote:

He seems to be out to impress Fnord for some reason (and he does a bad job of trying to mask the fact that he kisses his ass whilst feigning abuse).  It's like he's trying to "do" fnord (no not in that sense ... where's your head at?) -- but only fnord can be fnord.  When Px chimed in on that month-ago thread about the Old South he pretty much gave himself away as a sycophantic fraud trying to hide the fact that he is a sycophantic fraud.

What you’re suggesting isn’t implausible.  He once stated his ideal partner would be a Jewish MD with blue eyes and curly light brown hair.  I have blue eyes but otherwise I don’t fit his physical ideal.  On the other hand, I’ve been in a monogamous relationship with Partner™ for almost twenty years and I’ve stayed with him and taken care of him through what may prove to be his final illness.  His cancer appears to be in remission for now, but he’s a bit older than me, so the odds are good I will be single within a few years.

Pale has reached the age where he realizes most people don’t get everything they want in a relationship.  I possess personality characteristics that make me a good catch; if he’s tracked my activities on the net he knows I live within a few hour’s drive from him.  He has seen a picture of me and knows that while I’m not an ideal sexual fantasy from his perspective, mirrors don’t shatter when I enter the room.  And of course there’s the whole matter of whether or not the fnord persona accurately reflects who I am in real life.  He wouldn’t want “fnord”, but he’s curious about the man behind “fnord”.

Offline

 

#44 2009-12-24 02:38:07

You live in Sedona?

Offline

 

#45 2009-12-24 02:45:05

I'm not going to reveal my undisclosed location.

Offline

 

#46 2009-12-24 03:07:06

Uh Huh.  You Newager, you.

Offline

 

#47 2009-12-24 06:10:45

fnord wrote:

His cancer appears to be in remission for now

Glad to hear it; I wondered how you were getting along.

Offline

 

#48 2009-12-24 09:35:56

Horseonovich wrote:

Can someone tell me who it is that BigCat is swatting at (above)?    -- H

Wasn't swatting, I forgot to put the question mark at the end.

See how this changes the read?

Visions of sugarplums....?

Offline

 

#49 2009-12-24 10:59:23

AladdinSane wrote:

Now do all of you understand why I killfiled/ignored/whatever Tom Colligan when I first came to this board?

Hyuck.  You and the marm never cease to just slay me.

How go things, my broTHA?  Did I ever mention that I was half black?

Offline

 

#50 2009-12-24 11:09:57

fnord wrote:

Horseonovich wrote:

He seems to be out to impress Fnord for some reason (and he does a bad job of trying to mask the fact that he kisses his ass whilst feigning abuse).  It's like he's trying to "do" fnord (no not in that sense ... where's your head at?) -- but only fnord can be fnord.  When Px chimed in on that month-ago thread about the Old South he pretty much gave himself away as a sycophantic fraud trying to hide the fact that he is a sycophantic fraud.

What you’re suggesting isn’t implausible.  He once stated his ideal partner would be a Jewish MD with blue eyes and curly light brown hair.  I have blue eyes but otherwise I don’t fit his physical ideal.  On the other hand, I’ve been in a monogamous relationship with Partner™ for almost twenty years and I’ve stayed with him and taken care of him through what may prove to be his final illness.  His cancer appears to be in remission for now, but he’s a bit older than me, so the odds are good I will be single within a few years.

Pale has reached the age where he realizes most people don’t get everything they want in a relationship.  I possess personality characteristics that make me a good catch; if he’s tracked my activities on the net he knows I live within a few hour’s drive from him.  He has seen a picture of me and knows that while I’m not an ideal sexual fantasy from his perspective, mirrors don’t shatter when I enter the room.  And of course there’s the whole matter of whether or not the fnord persona accurately reflects who I am in real life.  He wouldn’t want “fnord”, but he’s curious about the man behind “fnord”.

Is it me or does one get the impression that fnordonovich has thought much of this through already in some depth, and frequently even? 

On a side note, fnord, if I didn't know you better, the above could also be construed as a personal marketing pitch to Pale (if not a direct entreaty).   You GO girl!

Offline

 

Board footer

cruelery.com