106. Christmas day re-union (1/6/03)

My family members used to re-union on holidays. In recent years, I was estranged from them, (my parents, brother and sisters) I rarely go to San Francisco to join with them. I think they were bothered and intimidated by agents for years. I don't want to give them trouble. I've talked about B (my young brother in law) whom unusually came to my house on Dec. 2001, dropped gifts then left right away. (see "48. Test") It's unusual because he never give X'mas gift.

So this time, when my sisters and brother said they would come to my house for Christmas holiday, (12/25/02) I was surprised. It never happened before. I said I have no Ma Jong. It's a Chinese game we used to play in re-union. They said they would bring it. They even brought a Ma Jong table with them that day.

When we had lunch, I talked about the messages I posted in internet which I hadn't told them before. I talked about the frame attemption in June, 2001 and May 2002. That B was a target because he is rich. And it's easy to plant because he imports many containers of goods from China. They said they couldn't figure out why FBI intending to frame them. My explanation was I thought FBI had contact all of them for years. Seeking cooperation from them. They all know I am innocent. If there would have been a frame case, their evidence would reveal the truth. That's why agents would frame them too. And there is one thing people rarely know, FBI seeking profit in their operation which made them a very corruptive organization. B said there was nothing he could do if FBI really intending to plant.

There were eight of us that day. After lunch, four of us played Ma Jong , my wife was preparing dinner while the other three were chatting. I continued my topic of "my American nightmare" while playing Ma Jong. Then I felt a little dizzy when the chatting three said they felt sleepy. They quickly went a sound sleep after my wife gave them blankets. They slept the whole afternoon until dinner time. That's something never have happened before. I think the agent who monitored us was angry with my talking. He didn't want my relatives know FBI's true face and beamed sleep radiation to interrupt the talking.

Another thing unusual on that day was a relative happened called on my sister's mobile phone so I could talk to him. We hadn't contact for years. He said he wanted to play badminton but couldn't find birdies. He asked me to mail him some. I told him to try to find them in K-mart, Walmart or sportsware shop. I wonder how could he know he would talk to me and had such a strange demand. I think it might be a trap. (see "79. Mail planting")

In the afternoon, the mobile phone rang up again. This time it was for B's. My sister woke up B. After listening the mobile phone, he went to my home phone, made a call. It seemed that he put an order to the manufacturer. Since B never borrow other's phone if he has his own, especially this was a long distance call, I think, too, this might be another trap. It looked like he was instructed by the mobile to do so. If there was a framed drug case, they could say the order was from my phone line.

Many things happened that day were unusual. I think it's FBI's aggressive work. Whatever it's reasonable or not, they set up trap to meet their own demand.


107. A new wave of personal attack

After Christmas day, right from 12/26 in some internet sites, I got similar intimidations. They have something in common: 1. Defamation. Link me to drug case 10 years ago, even with murder case. 2. Intimidation. Warning the using of high tech. weapon. The following messages were posted in one day. My feeling is a new frame case is in plan again. This time they will take the chance of Iraq war which may happen in near future. (Use a big event to divert public's attention is their style when they commit a crime.)

((Date Posted: 13:10:25 01/01/03 Wed
Author: KOBE RULZ

Poor KATHUK! I think your brain has been damaged by your own consumption of opium you have been smuggling since ten years ago (see article on Mrs. Chen's arrest in newspaper).

Date Posted: 12:56:23 01/01/03 Wed
Author: Vladimir

Kath Sung,
You are a victim of new and powerful high tech weapons! Because of similar drug smuggling, I was also victimized by the same high tech weapons! Those weapons have damaged your brain, because they are UNSAFE! Go see your doctor!

policeman
Wednesday January 01, 2003 9:10 PM (NEW!)

kathaksung is not lying! He really knew the 9/11 terror in advance. We have the evidence, and are out to hunt him down. He was a big case ten years ago, when he was convicted and sentenced to death in absentia, for drug smuggling and several murder cases. Note: His brain may have been damaged by our secret weapons.))

They all referred the information of high tech. weapon, it's interesting to read something they once denied, this time they feel the necessity to intimidate people.

Quote, "Kath Sung, ......See below and visit website to convince yourself!

MICROWAVE & BRAINWAVE SECRET WEAPONS

By using very low frequency electromagnetic radiation -- the waves way below radio frequencies on the electromagnetic spectrum -- he [Eldon Byrd] found he could induce the brain to release behavior-regulating chemicals. "We could put animals into a stupor," he says by hitting them with these frequencies. "We got chick brains -- in vitro -- to dump 80 percent of the natural opioids in their brains,'"Byrd says. He even ran a small project that used magnetic fields to cause certain brain cells in rats to release histamine. In humans, this would cause instant flulike symptoms and produce nausea. "These fields were extremely weak. They were undetectable," says Byrd. "The effects were nonlethal and reversible. You could disable a person temporarily," Byrd hypothesizes. "It [would have been] like a stun gun."
Byrd never tested any of his hardware in the field, and his program, scheduled for four years, apparently was closed down after two, he says. "The work was really outstanding," he grumbles. "We would have had a weapon in one year." Byrd says he was told his work would be unclassified, "unless it works." Because it worked, he suspects that the program "went black." Other scientists tell similar tales of research on electromagnetic radiation turning top secret once successful results were achieved. There are clues that such work is continuing. In 1995, the annual meeting of four-star U.S. Air Force generals -- called CORONA -- reviewed more than 1,000 potential projects. One was called "Put the Enemy to Sleep/Keep the Enemy From Sleeping." It called for exploring "acoustics," "microwaves," and "brain-wave manipulation" to alter sleep patterns. It was one of only three projects approved for initial investigation."

They left different links:

http://www.cognitiveliberty.org/issues/ … apons.html

http://www.datafilter.com/mc/nonlethalWeapons.html

http://www.tje.net/para/wots/9912/99_12_20_02.htm

108. Hurried arrest (sniper case) (1/16/03)

Government made conflict action after the arrest of Muhammad and Malvo. They painted Muhammad master suspect at first then dramatically turned onto Malvo. They put 20 Federal charges on Muhammad then dropped it a week later. The clue led to the arrest is unbelievable convenient. According to the government, The suspect called a priest, said they were involved in an shooting case in Alabama. So police could find them because Malvo left his finger print there. In another word, suspects tipped police to arrest them. In Alabama shooting case, police at first said the weapon was a short gun, after the two were arrested and the killing rifle was got, they said it was that Bushmaster rifle used in shooting, now they changed the story again said it was a short gun.
All these conflicts showed the arrest was made in a hurry, the insider group hadn't got everything ready. Then what pushed them make the arrest?

During the horrible time of shooting spree, when everybody was in alert and police activated all their resource, the sniper still eluded high security and kept on shooting, People with common sense could feel it could only be done by experts with inside security information. If perpetrators knew some news would reveal the truth, they hurriedly made the arrest to stop the spread of that news. Read that news. Remember the arrest was on Oct.24, the day news was going to publish.

For Immediate Release: October 24, 2002
US GOVERNMENT PLANNED SNIPER ATTACKS
PENTAGON PLANNED TO CARRY OUT SNIPER ATTACKS IN DC AND MIAMI


On his Nationally Syndicated Radio Show, Documentary Filmmaker Alex Jones has consulted with many law enforcement and military experts, including Colonel Craig Roberts (formerly of US Army Intelligence, a former Marine Corps Sniper and the Best-selling Author of One Shot One Kill) who stated on-air that this operation could only be State-sponsored and was clearly the work of a rogue element from the top levels of global intelligence agencies. On The Alex Jones Show, Roberts said that the MO of the sniper attacks are indicative of a 2-3 man team trained in the Special Forces ambush tactics of reconnaissance, insertion, concealment and successful evasion. According to Jones' research, the sniper team's attack profile is consistent with US Special Forces ambush assassination tactics.

Best-selling Doubleday Author James Bamford, who broke the Northwoods Story in His Book, Body of Secrets reported on page 82 that, "the plan, which had been written with the approval of the Chairman and every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff called for innocent people to be shot on American Streets."

http://www.infowars.com/northwoods.htm


109. Beware another terror attack

I've alleged government insiders made the OKC bombing, anthrax attack, sniper case and allowed 911 attack to happen to grip more police power and push for war in Mid-east. Some people argued how could government kill their own people. Compare the recent news and the revelation of the book. Beware another terror attack from our own government. (though always disguised as "enemy combatant" and "terrorist")

News: Within the past three weeks, US intelligence gathered what officials at Scott Air Force Base described as credible evidence of a planned bombing of a passenger airliner contracted to fly troops and freight for the military. (1/13/03, San Jose Mercury News)

Book: They called for hijacking jet airliners, attacking US military bases, blowing up US ships and wounding civilians in Miami, Florida and Washington, DC using paramilitary sniper teams . (northwoods story)

Operation Northwoods
Our U.S. Government Planned To Attack
"We The People"
Former ABC News investigative reporter James Bamford . Broke the Northwoods Story in His Book, Body of Secrets . It is based mostly on documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act or found in government archives.

"We could develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington," said one document reportedly prepared by the Joint Chiefs of Staff. "We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba," the document says. "Casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of indignation."

http://www.retakingamerica.com/northwoods_page_1.html


USA Today - Bush wrong to use pretext as excuse to invade Iraq "The answer was Operation Northwoods "

ABC News - Friendly Fire Book: U.S. Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S. Cities to Provoke War With Cuba "America's top military brass even contemplated causing U.S. military casualties "

110. When murderer became investigator (1/26/03)

Some people said there were hard evidence in sniper case such like Malvo's finger print was found on the rifle. The rifle was found in Caprice. But when the murderer became investigator, hard evidence could be a fake. There was an article in "Readers' Digest"(about in 1970's) topic"Finger print which lied"(Chinese edition) in which a lab technician transferred a victim's finger print to frame him.

Recently, the Governor of Illinois pardoned all death inmates from death penalty and released some because he found 60% of them were errorneous. The rape case in New York Central Park now proved wrong after the real rapist confessed he committed the crime. I think when judge and jury gave their verdict on these wrong cases, they all believed they had hard evidence. If these cases were
because of negligence, then what will it be if law enforcement agent deliberately frame a case?

FBI deliberatly framed Pratt to a murder case and almost had him executed if Supreme Court hadn't suspend the capital punishment at that time. (see #60. Plant, Frame and alleged murder )

Read this news of last month.
December 6, 2002
Ex-Prosecutor Tells of Ties Between F.B.I. and Mob
By FOX BUTTERFIELD

One person listening to the testimony today, in the Suffolk County Courthouse, was Joseph Salvatti. In 1967 Mr. Salvatti was sentenced to life in prison for a murder actually committed by an F.B.I. informer, and the bureau allowed Mr. Salvatti and three other men to be wrongly convicted, with the knowledge of J. Edgar Hoover.

"It's hard to sit listening, knowing the F.B.I. and the U.S. Attorney's office are lying, said Mr. Salvatti, who had his sentence commuted after serving 30 years in prison. "The bottom line is, they don't care."

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/06/natio … sition=top

I think the judges and jury of these two cases believed they had "hard evidence". And hard evidence could be created if the investigator is corruptive.

GooberMcNutly wrote:

Kooky Kathy wrote:

My family members used to re-union on holidays. In recent years, I was estranged from them, (my parents, brother and sisters)

Shocker!

I find it shocking that you actually read through Kathy's rant in order to pick out that little gem!

fnord wrote:

GooberMcNutly wrote:

Kooky Kathy wrote:

My family members used to re-union on holidays. In recent years, I was estranged from them, (my parents, brother and sisters)

Shocker!

I find it shocking that you actually read through Kathy's rant in order to pick out that little gem!

You mean you don't read EVERY word of EVERY Kathy post? I'm shocked!

116. The death of FBI analyst (2/28)

There is a Chinese proverb: "There is no three hundred taels of silver here." It said once a man who hid three hundred taels of silver under ground. To ensure nobody would know it, he put a note at the spot where he buried the silver:"There is no three hundred taels of silver here." When I heard the news on Oct. 14 2003 that sniper killed a FBI anlyst, I recall that proverb.

There were something unusual in this shooting death.

1. They beat the drum that a FBI agent was shot to death. Of all the victims, I only know one was a bus driver because he was shot at the bus parking lot where he worked. Another one because he was a student. People rarely know what career the other victims were at. But everybody knows there was a victim who was FBI agent.

2. They blew the trumpet that Malvo killed FBI analyst Linda Franklin. Newspaper all said Malvo admitted he killed FBI analyst. That even in computer Malvo left diary admitted so. If as police saying that Malvo was the one who pulled the trigger in most cases, then why did they repeatedly emphasize that he was the one who killed Linda Franklin but rarely talked about the other victims?

3. The killing place was a difficult one for a distant shooting. Generally, a sniper would avoid such place. I have no chance to see the other place of shooting cases. I only know they were all in open space, parking lot; gas station, shop entrance.....Due to a dense report on Linda's death, I had chance saw several times in TV news that she died in a roofed parking area. The roof was supported by many poles. Those poles blocked the view sight of sniper. If it was a random shooting, sniper would avoid such situation. There were a lot of open parking lot, why choose a difficult one? If it was a designated pick up, then to get rid of view obstacle he had to be close to the victim .

4. It was the only case which got detailed clues. The sniper eluded police. And was undetected in most cases. But this time, the figure of sniper was spotted, and the van was said with a left tail light out. Why? Apparently the difficult shooting surrounding forcing the sniper approaching close to the
victim, so this time he was seen by people.

5. It was the only case that police charged the witness. They said the man making a false statement to a law enforcement agent. How did they knew that man lied? S.J.M.N. reported, "There are other credible witnesses at the scene. That is how we were able to discredit his statement." The authority didn't say what reliable clues these credible witnesses given. And how credible these other witnesses were. But until Muhammad and Malvo were arrested, no clue talked about the blue Caprice, all clues talked about white van. So all witnesses made a false report. But authority seemed extraordinary severe on this witness. The shooting death took place on Monday, The man was held on Friday without bond over the weekend for arraignment next Monday.

Why are they so sensitive and over reactive on this man who gave a detailed clue? There is a possibility what he reported were true. They are scare of it. If the man hadn't admitted he made a false statement, he might be die for it. Arrest on Friday was a tactic law enforcement agent used to do if they planning for a plot. Bond bail won't work on week-end. They have extra two days for an "accident death". (see #65. Birthday Party on May 3 ) And as I said, if this was a case operated by "God"( intelligence), they were well covered by support teams such like Muhammad's. They not only would dart out their car to block a chasing, they also would be "credible witness" to mislead local police if necessary. They could even have ID of law enforcement agent.

Though the most victims of Washington DC shooting spree looked like being chosen at random, circumstance evidence showed that FBI analyst Linda Franklin was a designated pick-up. To ensure the killing, the sniper had to operate in a bad surrounding and had to do it in a close range. Thus he (them) was spotted by people. That's why now they repeated beating the drum to emphasize that Malvo admitted he pulled the plug.

In my message "#68. Ashcroft's revenge", "Re. 5. Culture of FBI", I said FBI knew OKC bombing in advance. Because though McVeigh's target were FBI and BATF, they were all absent that day. In DC shooting case, the sniper eluded detect so skillfully that people would think it was done by intelligence insiders. To get rid of that suspicion, they performed a scene of "There is no three hundred taels of silver here." (a scene of "FBI didn't do it") Then why Linda Franklin was chosen to be victim?

117. Swift response (3/10)

In 2/17 I posted message "115. The third leg in Alabama shooting case". That night, my wife told me Mr. Mao had a surgery on cancer and would die soon. I thought it was an immediate intimidation. Mr. Mao was importer of porcelain figurine and the main supplier for me when I had business ten years ago. Though he came from Taiwan, he went to China after he retired. One of his son has a factory in China and he bought a house there. Another son succeeded his business. He has a daughter lives here too. They all order their air tickets from my wife when they go to Taiwan and China. They knew my story. I think law enforcement agents had interviewed all of them for the information about me. They used to pick up their tickets in my wife's office. If they came to my house to pick up ticket, then they were ordered by agent to do so, I think.

Next day on 2/18, Mao's daughter came to my house to pick up her air ticket. It seemed more a business trip than visiting her father. The surgery was not a very recent one, Mao's other children didn't go back. She asked my wife to drive her to airport and left her car at the drive way of my garage. Her car parked there for almost a week until she came back from China. That's something never happened before. Nobody had ever left their car at my house. I think Mao's daughter was ordered to do so. When I stay at home to avoid FBI's aggressive work, they created links for me.

On 2/28, I posted another message "116. The death of FBI analyst" in internet. Next day my wife brought home a scent box. She installed it at the inside edge of toilet bowl. I wonder how she knew there was such kind of new thing since we never use scent box before. Then I found the drainage was blocked. Each time I rinsed the bowl, water swelled to the edge, soaked the box. I don't think it's a coincidence, blocking drainage and causing a flood is a popular trick they used to play. What's their purpose this time? I guess either they put drug inside box so they could show judge the trace of drug in drainage water, or if necessary, they can claim they found trace of drug in that box because it often soaked in bowl water.

This week-end, the other two sons of Mao came one after another to my house to pick up their tickets.(for business purpose) The unusual show up of all Mao's children in less than a month and deliberately leaving the car at my home made me think it was another FBI's plot. So I frankly told one of them what I thought that they probably would be victims of the frame case by those agents they worked for. To my surprise He was very calm. He said it was indeed very easy to be planted and that there was nothing can do to prevent from it.

His words remind me of lemon. On 1/26, I was motivated by a lady who sent bargain crab to us on that week end. I felt they were pushing us to consume more vinegar. So I wrote the message "112. How they plant (2)". Before I wrote that article, at least once a week, we had the luck to eat crab at good price. After I posting the message on 1/26, till now it's 6 weeks, no crab any more. The response was full and swift. But the work is going on in another way. My wife brought a lot of lemons home, said it was a gift from friend. The lemon, plays the same role of vinegar. We have no habit to cook with lemon, so the lemon are put in basket in kitchen like a decoration.

I could feel the heat of their swift response. I had expected they planed another plot in April. So I thought I could finish the "sniper case" series before April. But it was interrupted by their aggressive work. I think the messages of 115 and 116 made them very angry. They moved up earlier. They may start Iraq war in March (as early as on 3/17) and take that advantage to divert the attention of the frame case in which there will be a slaughter.

118. The dead FBI analyst (2) (3/21)

October 16, 2002, Wednesday
NATIONAL DESK
THE HUNT FOR A SNIPER: THE DEAD; Escaping the Grip of Cancer, Only to Die at a Sniper's Hand
By SARAH KERSHAW (NYT) 958

Quote, "A year ago, at 46, Ms. Franklin, an analyst for the F.B.I., had faced the prospect of her own death: a diagnosis of breast cancer and tests showing the disease so advanced that she had to have a double mastectomy, relatives said. Then, late in August, they said, her 18-year-old niece was killed in a car accident, ......

she had worked for four years as an intelligence operations specialist in the cyberdivision and was considered a keen analyst, colleagues said."

I think Linda Franklin was a FBI dislike already. Breast cancer is a common method used to demolish dislike. In my messages "58. Manipulating media and killing by radiation" and "60. Plant, Frame and alleged murder " the women all died of breast cancer. When they needed a sacrifice. She was the convenient one. Then why she was the target?

Media is controlled by intelligence. When government intends a war in Iraq, there is a censorship on anti-war sentiment. But there is a new way in public communication - internet. FBI, naturally, would try to control that area. Many of my messages talked about my experience of being attacked and harassed in internet. Just like anthrax attack and DC sniper shooting, I think many internet attack were from Federal agents too. If Linda Franklin had been a keen analyst in cyberdivision and did her duty, she was an obstacle to those rogue team. The keener she was, more danger she was in.

The agents of FBI field office don't know the other side of their high ranking officers. When they were doing their work, they might innocently offend their boss. This happened when they were blocked for further investigation on 911 suspects. (FBI Phoenix and Minnisota office) Linda Franklin could not avoid involving in such situation.

119. FBI awards man who blocked MN investigation

Quote, " FBI performs a nasty little sequel to whistle-blower saga
Doug GrowStar TribunePublished Dec. 22, 2002

The Star Tribune's Greg Gordon reported last week that at a quiet little ceremony earlier this month, Marion (Spike) Bowman was one of nine people in the bureau to receive an award for "exceptional performance." The award carries with it a cash bonus of 20 to 35 percent of the recipient's salary and a framed certificate signed by the president.

What does this have to do with Rowley?
Bowman heads the FBI's National Security Law Unit. That's the unit that blocked Minneapolis agents from pursuing their suspicions about Moussaoui.
There were no FBI honors for the Minneapolis office. There was a big honor for the lead antagonist of the Minneapolis office."

http://www.startribune.com/stories/462/3547688.html

120. Cyber-attack

On 2/6 I posted a message "113. Internet attack ". In which I alleged the Federal agent activated large internet attack to practice their skill. Next day, in the newspaper there was an article talked about Bush had signed a secret order for launching cyber attack. It was a swift response to my allegation. A show-off that they are even supported by President of United States.

Quote, "Bush seeks to develop cyber-attack plans
New form of weaponry could alter means of waging war

by Bradley Graham
Washington Post

Washington - President Bush has signed a secret directive ordering the government to develop, for the first time, national-level guidance for determining when and how the United States would launch cyber-attacks against enemy computer networks, according to administration officials. ....

Bush signed the order known as National Security Presidential Directive 16, in July but it has not been disclosed publicly until now".
(San Jose Mercury News 2/7/2003)

121. Attempt to get hand writing note. (3/31)

In 3/21, I posted "118. The dead FBI analyst (2)" in internet. Next day(Saturday), same scene reacted. (see "117. Swift response (3/10)") My wife told me Mao's daughter would go to China next day Sunday. In the afternoon, someone knocked at the door. It was Mao's daughter. She asked if I knew my wife's cellular phone number when she knew my wife was not at home. I told her I didn't know because I rarely use telephone. I felt it was another attempt of agent to create a link between her and I . They arranged her visit at a time I was home alone. So I straightly told her, "I think you come under the order of FBI." She immediately turned around and went back to her car. I followed her to finish my warning. The simple story of how agent trying to frame me. That her car parking at my house last month and her visit today were all an attempt to create a link. That it was easy to be trapped in a framed drug case if she had business. I reminded her "Don't think you are working for them then they won't hurt you. For their own good, They don't care to sacrifice anyone working for them. Mao's daughter closed the car door and made a phone call, she had a cellular phone in her hand.

I went back home to the computer, in a minute she came back again. She repeated the same question for my wife's phone number. I said, "Haven't I told you I don't know?" She then walked around, looked like to be in a stupefaction. Once she was going to my daughter's room, so I asked "What are you going to do?" She said, "To see if your daughter has a phone." I reminded her, "you have a cellular phone in your hand." "Oh." she then asked for a piece of paper to leave her phone number to my wife. For convenience I grasped a junk mail from table, handed to her. She refused, hinted she need a piece of paper. "Why not?" I asked. For a phone number an envelope was enough. She then asked for a pen. I reminded her there was a pen in her hand already. "Oh." She looked like just waking up from a dream. She wrote down her phone number than left. Obviously she made a call to her handler that her cover up was blewn off when she went back to her car. The agent ordered her to fulfil the mission they told her to do. So she came back to repeat the same question. She was so nervous that she even forgot she had phone and pen in her hand. I guess the purpose of agent was to let her get a note from me (with the excuse of writing down my wife's phone number) Which they would use as a "hard evidence". They would create something on that piece of paper, so they even prepared the pen. Made the fake writing and my genuine writing from same pen. Though sometimes people visit friends with cell phone in their hands, it's unusual to visit with a pen in hand. But Mao's daughter didn't know what to do when I told her I didn't know the phone number, that's why she had tried to go to my daughter's room, intended to make a phone call for the instruction.

This is not the only case they tried to get my hand writing. In March 14, 2000, after I wrote a complaint letter to US consulate, I was in Ranong, Burma. A lady came to me, said she was an oversea's Chinese. She guided me to the local market and helped me shopping some food. When I thanked her for the help, she took out a notebook and a pen, asked me to leave my name. I wrote down my name without suspicion. Several days later, the attempt of framed drug case alarmed me. I recalled this and thought it might be a trap. I'm not a celibrity, what's the use for my signature? About ten days later, in a phone store in Bangkok which I frequently went for its low rate, the girl working there handed me a blank paper said she would like to have my name written on paper. She said she was curious in Chinese characters. It was a store offering international phone service where she had a lot of chances to meet Chinese, why picked up me? I refused. I drifted in South-east Asia for more than a year, this was the only two times I was asked for signature. All happened in March when they tried to frame me in drug case. I don't think it's coincidence.. The plot of April

In Feb.4, 2003, there was a news in World Journal (Chinese) which said that 5 members of "Aryan Brotherhood" gang admitted guilty in attempted murder, drug smuggling. The court verdict would be in this April. I have alleged agent would murder by the hands of gangsters. I also have talked about this gang in message "62. Plot". It seems they plan to do it in April. Then my wife said she would take a vacation trip to China with my daughter and father in law on April 18. I'll be left home alone. In another word, nobody knows what happens if they apply something on me.

Each criminal has his own style to commit a crime. Feds has its own, too. To murder and frame drug case by the hands of gangsters, local police, foreign power, (in this case, Chinese secret police). And divert public attention by big event.(in this case, Iraq war) When I review the coming April, it is so similar to the case they designed two years ago. See messages from #61 to #67.

The late development strenthens my opinion. On 2/28/03 I posted "116. The death of FBI analyst (2/28)" in internet. The message was written on 2/27. Which means the agent who monitoring me knew it as early as on 2/27.

On 3/1, the newspaper reported that seven top San Francisco police officials (include chief) were indicted for blocking probe of cops in brawl. That's a big news. I had expected Federal agent would take advantage at the case of three S.F.cops in brawl. But I didn't expect they'll charge top ranking police officials. It looks like they'll do a big case in S.F. Ten months ago I posted a message "67. Turn on into local police (5/29)" which said FBI released data to put pressure on S.F.P.D. Now it seems they directly extort on S.F.P.D.. From indictment to trial date of this case, there is only one month and a half. Pretty short for the charged 7 high ranking officials. I don't think the trial date, April 18th, is a coincidence to my wife's travel date. And something very unusual happened in this top policemen's indictment.


123. Unusual case against top S.F. police officers (4/10)

There were often reported cases of police abusing their power. In many cases they shot the innocent people to death. But they mostly could successfully quit the charge. Seldom the other officers who not involved in case would be charged.

This time, seven top ranking officers were indicted on obstruction charges in the alleged coverup of an investigation into a drunken brawl in which three police officers faced assault charges. The chief, Sanders, was nominated by Mayor Brown. They are a big political power in San Francisco. Who took the risk to challenge this power? It must be a power even bigger.

The unusual thing is the grand jury don't have evidence but probable cause to raise the charge. Is that too frivolous to offend a power? It's totally unnecessary. Re: "Last month, Hallinan told grand jurors his office may not have the evidence to prove the allegations, according to transcripts of grand jury's proceedings, but the panel handed up the indictments anyway." (S.J.M.N. 3/12/03)

The most unusual thing is the indictment was finished in a hurry, at last minute. Read this:
"Referring to the handwritten attachments to the indictment, Peter Keane, dean of the Golden Gate University Law School and a former public defender, said he had not seen such a thing in California in more than 75 years. "It means the grand jury was scribbling and changing and editing right up to the last minute. " (S.J.M.N. 3/5/03)
"A handwritten addendum to the typed complaint - which caused defense attorneys to claim that the whole document was slipshod when it was released Tuesday - was printed on plain paper because the jurors added the charges just before the indictments were signed by a judge Thursday evening."(S.J.M.N. 3/7/03)

Obviously the charge was added at last minute. They even didn't have time to typewrite addendum. Did it more like an intelligence work than normal judicial process? A movie story was vivid there only it was reality this time. Who had that ability to do this? To manipulate a grand jury, prosecutors, to challenge a big political power? I think it was out of someone who thought they were God who could do anything.

I believe the indictment against top ranking police officers of San Francisco was an attempt to create extortion base by intelligence. They need help from local police in a framed case.

124. The development of the S.F. top police officers' case

On 3/10/03, D.A. dropped case against top two officers, Chief Sanders and his second-in-command because there was no sufficient evidence. However, Halinan said he would still prosecute five other supervisors on obstruction of justice charges and three other officers involved in a drunk brawl.

On 3/31, I posted a message "122. The plot of April" in which I alleged this was an extortion attempt.

Four days later, on 4/4, a judge dismissed the charges against the rest five high ranking police officers. She said the prosecution did not offer enough evidence to support the allegation of a conspiracy.

I think this was a swift response to my message. I had experience. See message: 96. Follow up (2) of Judi Bary's case in "60. Plant, Frame and alleged murder ". They responsed with a trial on date just in several days. Another reason I think so is the newspaper report. It's a big case in Bay Area. Almost each report about this case, (include report that D.A. dropping the charge against Chief Sanders) occupied about half page with big title and pictures. The finishing of the charge against top ranking officers, (the rest five supervisors) was only a short message about 150 words hidden in a small column with a title of small letters. If I hadn't heard it in TV news and made a search next day, I would have missed it.

I think these were a swift responses to my opinion about sniper case.

115. The third leg in Alabama shooting case. (2/17)
Next day(2/18) they send Mao's daughter to my house who left for China on night and parked her car at my house. See message "117. Swift response (3/10)"

116. The death of FBI analyst (2/28)
I wrote this message on 2/27. On 2/28, they charged top 7 S.F.police officers. In a hurry to catch the trial on 4/18. See previous message.

118. The dead FBI analyst (2) (3/21)
Next day(3/22), Mao's daughter came again, she would go to China on 3/23. See message "121. Attempt to get hand writing note. (3/31)".

They made Mao's daughter coming to my house right after I posted sniper case message. ( Who for years hadn't been to my house.) And arranged a business trip for her to China just in one or two days. It's easy to lure her in profitable business then plant drug in shipment.

I think my opinion and analysis about sniper case is very correct. They are afraid of it and had a very aggressive response.

125. An open letter to those who like to reprint my article (4/21)

On 4/13, I received an e-mail from the host of "This webpage is better than yours". In which it said, "The content on your homepage is extremely interesting. .....May I have your permission to reprint your content on my webpage?"

Since I don't communicate by e-mail privately in case there is a trap, I answer here in internet.

Dear Wayne DeGroot,

Thank you for your interesting in my article. You can reprint my article in your webpage freely. But you don't own it. And you can't forbid others to spread and reprint it. Someone had the same request a year ago, I posted a public announcement (message #52) talked about it. You won't miss it if you had read my article. I repeat it here.

Anybody who is interested in my messages posted in internet can download them and publish them with no obligation. It's free. I have only two request: 1. Put my name "Kat Hak Sung" on the publish. 2. You can correct mis-spelling word, but can't add or reduce the content of each message. No individual person, or group, or organization can own my messages privately and forbid others to read, publish them. The purpose of this announcement is to prevent someone from censoring my messages if I was murdered. Kat Hak Sung is my real name.

Sorry I don't communicate privately because I don't want anybody declare that they have sole private right of my articles because I directly e-mail them. I don't want to disappoint those who really intend to publish my messages. So I made previous public announcement. I'll be glad you can spread my messages.

Regards

Kat Hak Sung

126. Sniper case (crime style)

Every criminal has his own crime style, sniper killing is used to be seen in political assassination. Such like the assassination of President Kennedy, ( I had been intimidated that he was killed by law enforcement agent. see message #17) And the assassination of M.L.King. ( It is said Dr. King was a dislike of former FBI director Mr. Hoover ) Sniper killing is also frequently used by law enforcement agent. In any case when SWAT involved, there are always snipers located on the roofs. In Rubyridge case, a FBI sniper killed family members of Weaver.

I personally had the experience of Feds sniper.

One was in Thailand. In March 2000, when Foreign Ministry of Thailand told me to ask for asylum in Internal Ministry, and Internal Minister resigned from his post for a sudden scandal, I knew they determined to frame me in drug case. Newspapers suddenly reported drug smugglers arrested and board patrol intensified. They made a drug arrest reasonable already. How could I avoid their trap? I thought of the Golden Triangle. It is famous for its opium trade. Now is a tourist spot. Though Golden Triangle related to drug, it seemed the only way I could choose to leave Thailand safely. They couldn't say they arrested a man who tried to smuggle drug to where it was produced. It would be as absurd as accusing a man sale soda to Coca-cola Co. I went to travel agency to ask for the trip to Golden Triangle. They all told me that I had to go to ChinMai first, stay there overnight then take a local bus to the board of Burma and Thailand next day. When I was in hesitation, there was an article in newspaper said that US law enforcement agent had an expert sniper newly arrived in Thailand. He would be positioned at North Thailand to shoot drug smugglers. The article introduced the sniper's glorious past, that how many people he had killed in the war. I read a lot of newspaper everyday. They knew it and often delivered the intimidation by newspaper. I got used to it. This time their information was clear. If I wouldn't go to their trap, they would shoot me to death. I then changed my mind to go to Laos. Though Laos was not so popular for drugs, it was still unusual to charge smuggle drug from Thailand to Laos. And one of my consideration was I could take a train direct to board cross. Nong Khai was a city, where a foreigner could hardly do a sniper job among dense population.

On April 5, I took a night train to Nong Khai. At midnight, the train stopped in an open field for nearly two hours. I looked out of the window, it was dark. Would there be an expert sniper there? I wonder. Luckily, the train was crowded. Seats were full with many people standing by. It was a long time for me. At last the train moved and brought me to the board. The sniper killing threat remained in my mind. (story see messages "51. Unbridle power of intelligence.")

You can find that sniper article in Thailand newspaper. The time should be about late March to early April in 2000.

Another one took place in June, 2001. I talked about it in message "# 63. A well planed frame case". I alleged Feds framed a big case in that month. My nephew, a Stanford student, was a target too. I think they planned a random shooting death for him. To make the case looked like a result of racial hatred, they shot an Asian girl to death at first. The execution of McVeigh was designated on 6/11. The framed case should be about same time so the McVeigh's death could diverge public's attention. The innocent Asian girl was shot to death on 6/10. Read this.

"WOMAN SHOT, KILLED OUTSIDE PALO ALTO CLUB POLICE HAVE NO MOTIVE, NO WITNESS FOR SLAYING

Maria Ann Hsiao had just walked outside a crowded Palo Alto nightclub early Sunday when someone shot her in the head. Police said no one reported seeing her killer, not the 15 or 20 people standing nearby nor the hundreds inside.

Panicked patrons flagged down a patrol car in front of the Q Cafe on Alma Street moments after the shooting at 12:20 a.m., setting off a rare homicide investigation in a city known more for serenity and Stanford University than violence."

(S.J.M.N. 6/11/2001)

The situation just like the DC sniper shooting. People nearby didn't know where the bullet came from. Of course, the case remained unsolved. But when DC sniper case started, the same description of bystanders reminds me the sniper might be from the same origin and use the same style. That's why I viewed the DC sniper case from another angle right from the beginning.

127. Heavy harassment (5/3)

I was harassed heavily in internet recently. They use "error page" , or "downloading page" which constantly popped out to harass reading and writing. Slow processing was frequently used. Several times they just blocked the entering. Give a "Can't Find the Web Site" page for each click in. Forced me to abandon the surfing in internet. Sometimes they gave a page of "Sorry, you may not post at this time. This forum has a waiting period before new members can post a message. Please return in 6 hours to post." For different web sites, they entered different number of hours for fun. I think it's that kind of work cultivated their mentality of "I'm god" because they can control others' life. These significantly slowed my internet surfing.

Moreover, in several web-sites where people can post without registration, they assumed my name to post fake messages. They use my e-mail address and post my phone-number there. The article made me look like a psycho with the content like: "How I become alleged murder of Ron (undercover agent)" . "How me, Kat Hak Sung, becomes alleged murder of Ron ", "Every criminal like me has his own crime style". People can see these forgery at:
http://dcregistry.com/forums/politics/welcome.html
http://www.mysteryguide.com/index.php
http://www.free-market.net/forums/drugs0009/

Though they used to do their job without leaving hard evidence, these attacks could be rarely some.

FBI has a history abusing their power of eroding civil liberty. There is little check and balance on this power. I believe there are rogue team inside the intelligence involved in criminal activities. When decent and keen agent discovered such kind of problem, and tried to do real law enforcement job, what will happen? They usually were blocked for doing further investigation like in event of MN field office and Phoenix office in 911 case, or being under fire like Turner, even being eliminated "accidently" like Linda Franklin.

FBI agent under fire - from agency
Exclusive interview: Turner blew whistle on Ground Zero theft
By Lisa Myers
NBC NEWS

WASHINGTON, April 29 - For a quarter-century, Jane Turner has been a special agent for the FBI. But now the agency is trying to fire her, and Turner says it's because she blew the whistle on FBI wrongdoing. Agent Turner tells her story in an exclusive interview with NBC's senior investigative correspondent, Lisa Myers.

http://www.msnbc.com/news/907004.asp?vts=050120030740

128. Location, time and motive (sniper case)

Muhammad lived in Washington State which is at west coast. The sniper shooting spree took place in Washington DC which is at east coast. If this is a case for blackmail, he could do it anywhere, or most conveniently, near where he lived. What made him took that trouble to cross the whole continent to east coast? Because the case targetted at law makers. They had to shoot at DC area so Congressmen could feel the threat. And the time went tally with the authorization of Iraq war power to President Bush.

Time table:
10/2/2002: House Speaker Dennis Hastert and Minority Leader Richard Gephardt introduced the bill (H. J. Res 114) to authorize the use of armed force against Iraq.

. . First 2 shooting: Same day in evening, sniper started his shooting spree. 1st shot was at a Craft-store window, broke the glass but hurt no one. It might be a declaration of the start of shooting by sniper. Then a man was killed in a grocery parking lot.

10/3: The bill went to the International Relations Committee for the beginning of debate.

. . Shooting 3-7: Five shooting took place the same day, all victims dead. Six deaths in less than 28 hours shocked the whole country, especially those lived in the area. Of course, including those politicians in Capital Hill.

10/4 (Friday) Debate on bill.

. . 8th shooting: A woman wounded in parking lot.

10/5-10/6 (week-ends) Politicians took a rest, sniper coincided by taking a rest too.

10/7 (Monday) Debate on bill resumed.

. . 9th shooting: Shooting resumed too. A boy wounded at school.

10/9 Debate on bill continued.

. . 10th shooting: Man killed in gas station.

10/10 House passed the bill.

10/11 Senate passed the bill.

. . 11th shooting: Man shot dead at gas station. It took place at 9:30 am, could be a last push on Senate.

10/14 12th shooting: FBI analyst was shot to death in Home Depot parking lot.

10/16 Bush signed the Bill.

10/19 13th shooting: Man killed outside a restaurant.

10/23 14th shooting: Bus driver killed in bus parking lot.

Can you find how the sniper shooting helped pushing through the Bill to authorize the power of Iraq war to President Bush?

129. My view on sniper case (5/16)

The sniper spree started at the same day when the bill (H.J. res 114) "authorizing the use of armed force against Iraq" was introduced to the House. Six deaths within first 28 hours shocked the country, especially those lived in the DC area. Senators were warned it was dangerous to be in golf field. The shooting continued, maintained a terror pressure on politicians. On Oct. 11, 9:30 am, the eleventh shooting made a last push on Senators. Later that day, Senate passed the bill.

It was 10 days from Oct. 2 (introduce the bill) to Oct. 11. (bill passed). There were 11 shootings took place during that time. Averaged more than one shooting a day. I call it the first stage. (action stage) The insider group successfully reached their goal, pushed the bill passing through.

Since President Bush needed this bill, the shooting push was unnecessary for him. The second stage started from 10/12(bill passed) to 10/24 (Mohammad and Malvo arrested). I call it retreat stage in which they planted, covered up their trace and found a scapegoat. There were 3 shootings in this 12 days period, much less than in the 1st stage. Yet, they have particular meanings. What would they do after the mission was done? Cover up.

The first one of the 3 shootings was on 10/14 where a FBI analyst was shot to death. A way to quit from suspect's profile. Because the victim of this case was a designated one, so there were many unusual things happened in this case and made it one special in all the shooting spree. (see message "116. The death of FBI analyst (2/28)")

Then, the second one of 3 shootings told people the motive of this shooting spree was for money. The shooting on 10/19 came with the demand of 10 million dollars from sniper. The unusual thing was if it was a blackmail, why did they demand the money so late? In most blackmail cases, the first thing criminal did was to request a ransom after they kidnapped the victim. It was amazing to see they shot FBI staff first than thought of to plant a motive. How eager they tried to quit from the suspect profile.

The last shooting on 10/23 was followed by the arrest of the two in Caprice. Which made many people think Mohammad and Malvo were the snipers because there was no more sniper shooting afterwards. To avoid being embarrassed by incapable to solve this case like what happened in anthrax attack, they hurried to frame it a blackmail case in last 5 days. (from 10/19 to 10/24)

130. SARS

I noticed this case first in early March, 2003. A news in World Journal said an American businessman (Chinese ethnic) went from Shanghai to Hanoi and got sick there on 2/26.
He then chartered a private plane to HongKong on 3/6. At that time, nobody knew SARS. I was impressed by the cost he paid for the charted plane: $600,000. I thought if he would pay that much, he must know it was fatal and hard to be cured. Maybe he wanted to back to US? The hospital he stayed in Hanoi was among the best in Vietnam, named French Hospital. Several days later, another news reported his death on 3/13. I later knew his name was Johnny Chen. With his death, people were aware of a new disease. But until 3/18, newspaper still called it "mysterious illness".

Source and how it spreads.

Johnny Chen was said the source of SARS infected two dozens of medical workers in Hanoi Frence Hospital. But I noticed there was no report of infection in Princess Margaret Hospital in Hongkong where he was sent to and died. That was a puzzle. How could he be the super contagious source in one hospital but didn't infect others in another hospital?

Though there was no infection in Princess Margaret Hospital, in another Hospital Prince Wales of HongKong, there were about dozens medical workers caught the disease at same time. There were two other sites where people were infected in group. One was Jin-Hua Hotel where 6 tourists who had stayed in 9th floor caught the SARS. Another one was Tao-da Mansion where about 300 residents were infected. I noticed there were no report of infection of family members of sicked medical staffs. And there was no report of colleagues being infected by those 300 residents of Tao-da Mansion. I think SARS maybe spread by close contact. And it seems more like a disease spread by location. That is: someone had visited the above three sites, left high contagious SARS source. People lived, or worked in these places caught the disease by touching the source or inhaling the air from source. Though there were conflict report of how SARS spreading. A report may represent my opinion. Quote, "The expert of mainland China found, a patient who was among the people first being infected, had no family member being infected, but friend who visited him got sick. The first foreigner who died of SARS in mainland China, had none friend with close relationship being infected. But those who had been with him for a short time, in same location, e.g. being in same lift, caught SARS." (World Journal, 4/20/03) It could be infected by touching polluted spot, or by inhaling the air from a polluted ventillation output. The above three sites all have common ventillation system. (Hospital, Hotel, and mansion where lift using ventillation)

500 milliTimeCubes

363 milliTimeCubes

146. Regime change

The regime change I met was not for liberation or democracy. It's for cover up of corruption.

(1) In Tailand, March 2000, when Foreign Ministry informed me to apply asylum in Interior Ministry, within days, they made Interior Minister resigned from his post. (see #50. Seeking asylum. and #51. Unbridle power of intelligence.)

(2) Regime change in Fujian

In mid 1999, I think they guided and conducted my wife built links to her home countryside- bought a house in XiaMen city, Fujian province. It's only 20,000 for that three bedrooms apartment. My wife said it was a special price, because a relative knew developer. The price was so good, my wife's brothers bought the new houses too. The other development see #142, 143, Drug case in Fujian.

I allege agents tried to frame a drug case with links to the Fujian gang. Because it would be a frame case, to avoid investigation, they must change the regime like what happened in Tailand.

In mid 1999, there was a big smuggle case broke out in Fujian. The base of smuggle ring was in XiaMen city. It was said the biggest smuggling case in China. Hundreds of government officials involved. Seven were put to death. Include high ranking officials of provincial administrators and police officials. It was a big regime change. Many said it's a political struggle. I believe The Chinese secret police conducted this case and got the post they wanted to control.

3. Regime change in California

The recent one took place in San Francisco. see messages #122, 123, 124, about "Unusual case against top S.F. police officers" which took place in March, 2003.

At the same time they activated a recall on California Governor Gray Davis. It's unusual because Davis was just elected for his second term. The recall signature collect date started from 3/25/03, only four months after Davis' re-election. A case started as sudden as the top S.F. police officials being indicted.

The governor can order an investigation of a case, he also can appoint officials to oversee state prison system where I allege the murder will happen if there is a frame case. I saw intelligence shadow behind the recall.

147. Steal California (7/31)

It's an operation can only be activated by an organization with large resource.

1) No one has such determination to do this just 4 months after the Governor being re-elected unless it has an urgent motivation.
2) Though Republican like to see Davis losing the post of Governor, they also worry about a backlash by voters. They lack of the motivation.
3) A swift and effective movement to collect 1.7 million of signatures show that it was done by a well organized and experienced group. Which has rich financial and manpower resource.
4) Some activists with a dirty background. Issa, the man started the recall, was fined for gun possession, faced theft charge. He had a string of youthful brushes with the law that include allegations of stealing cars and once set fire to his car-alarm business. Davis camp also complained some people worked to collect signatures with criminal record so tainted petition. We know Federal agents used to manipulate gang member and criminals to work for them.
5) The group behind the scene has rich resource in judicial system. Though Davis camp filed suits in court to halt the recall, they suffered setbacks both in Sarcamento and Los Angles counties. The suits were rejected within days, a very efficient procession in judicial system.
6) The group behind the scene has rich resource in media. Mercury News, so said a "liberal media", propagand on recall with first page, pages of articles, stories such like "The pay only $7 yearly in car tax, which will increase to $20 under Gov. Gray Davis' proposed budget." hinted Davis will be ousted.
7) The group behind the scene also has big influence in Democratic Party. Though Davis is in inferior position. No other Demo came out to run the election. This is incredible. Which means they'll give up the position to their rivals without campaign.
8) My experience is media is in stronghold of intelligence. Early this year, a TV station announced one of their colleague would leave to work in a county election office. I had a feeling then they'll move their resource to control the election office for 2004. Now it seems they are preparing for an early election.

California is a camp of Democratic Party. With a sudden attack, I expect a patsy of intelligence will steal it. Which will enable intelligence easier do any commitment. But also US democracy will fall further into a covert totalitarianism.

148. Regime change in San Jose Police

On 7/13, a San Jose police officer shot and killed a VietNamese ethnic woman in her kitchen. Police were answering a call from her neighbor that the woman neglected to take care of her child. Police said they found woman was a threat to them by holding a knife. Her relative said it was only a fruit peeler. Police over reacted with a deadly force to a small woman .

There were a lot of such police killing cases every year. Mostly police quit the charge especially if the victim holding a weapon, (or looked like a weapon). Seldom they were challenged by judicial system because police is a power. But this time it's different.

VietNamese community held protest in city hall, San Jose police chief Bill Lansdowne had to stand out clarifying its policy. Media reported with first page picture and discuss. When I read the news that "Responding to public outrage over the police shooting death of a 25-year-old San Jose woman, the Santa Clara County District Attorney's Office took the unusual step Wednesday of calling for an open grand jury to publicly air the facts in the case."(S.J.M.N. 7/17) I knew this time they'd take the chance to extort S.J.P.D..

On 7/24, big topic in first page:"FBI looks at fatal shooting in S.J." "Agency reviewing whether police abused woman's rights". At the same time, San Jose Police Chief Lansdowne was reported to take the top job in San Diego.

It took only 10 days to succeed a regime change in S.J.P.D.. Chief Lansdowne made no mistake. He was under great pressure of "unusual step" and was lured to another job offer. Since then there were reports of Lansdowne and his new job in San Diego. The dead woman's case was disappeared from newspaper. After all, it is a game of power and manipulation of power. The dead woman's right is only a tool used in this game.

149. Dig the history

On 7/24, my brother came to my house with two case of toys. It was toys I deposit in his garage. About 16 years ago(or longer?), I sold toys. Since my garage was full, I deposited some in my brother's garage. Then I switched the merchandise to porcelain. Those toys were forgotten.

The sudden return of the toys alarmed me. These days, agents were aggressively set up traps. They put tire at my door, blocked the drainage, tried to have my roof changed, agents even came to knock at my door. When all these failed, they dug the history.

I think agents had interviewed all my relatives and acquaintances long time ago and got every detail of me. Now they turned to the toy box which I forgotten already. It's easy to plant something inside. My brother told me, there were some more. I worry they are preparing a frame case on these box.

150. Development of Fujian drug case (8/11)

For more than two years in internet, I alleged Federal agents frame drug case against me and my family with the help of Chinese secret police. Which was proved by the breakout of Fujian drug case in 5/16/2003. Now it becomes clear how they managed to create a regional link on us by luring my wife to buy a house in Fujian. And arranged a trip for her to Fujian on 4/18/03. For that trip they even left a route free of SARS for her to go. I revealed it in message "142. Drug case in Fujian" on 6/28/03. Two days later, on 6/30, neighbour D knocked at the door, asked for a roof change. It's a swift revenge attempt. From their urgent reaction, it proves my allegation is correct.

About 10 days or so ago, I heard a news from local Chinese TV station that to an investigation mission FBI complained they lacked of fund to operate. That their pay is low. One of their agent in LA, with a salary of 26,000 a year, can't afford a permanent residence. That another agent in San Francisco, though with a pay of nearly 50,000 a year, had to do an overload work. (Since it was from TV, I haven't seen it in newspaper, the number of salary is from my memory, but is approximately right.) "FBI are underpaid? Strange news." I thought.

Days later, on 8/2 I noticed a news. It was very short, even without topic. The whole message is:"Karen P. Tandy, the first woman to run the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, said Friday that her main goal is to focus on dismantling larger international drug-trafficking organizations and choke off their money supply." (S.J.M.N)

Combined two unusual short and vague news I realized it was for that Fujian drug case there is an internal investigation. Someone has to step down to take the responsibility. (Though the news didn't say it, no doubt there was a regime change. The fomer director of DEA was a man.) And to my accusation that they manipulating the drug gang, allowed it growing bigger and bigger, their defence was they are in shortage of fund. So they cultivated criminal group, guided them to commit crime, once the gang became big and fat, Feds reap the profit. (see "8. FBI's profit") Justice is business. Criminal became a tool of Fedral law enforcement agents to loot money from the people.

Many information revealed Feds knew OKC bombing and 911 attack in advance. Terror attacks were allowed to happen because Feds need it. Former FBI director Freeh had proposed a bill with same content like "Patriot Act" after OKC bombing but failed. Ashcroft proposed it again after 911 and succeeded. They manipulate terrorists and criminals to grasp more power and money. To cover up their criminal activity, they use "secret", "national security" to block investigation. DOJ needs a reform. People should have more power to monitor the Federal agents.

katsung47 wrote:

Some people don't believe that government would spend so much resource (time and money) to murder me

If the government wanted to murder you, they'd have to spend just about precisely dick to find you and take you out.  The very fact of your posting this shit PROVES beyond any doubt that nobody with the resources of a government wants to kill you.  That's means not only is the US government not trying to kill you, neither is the government of any country.

How hard do you think it is to disappear someone when you have the resources of a whole government?

katsung47 wrote:

peco wrote:

katsung47 wrote:

Some people don't believe that government would spend so much resource (time and money) to murder me

If the government wanted to murder you, they'd have to spend just about precisely dick to find you and take you out.  The very fact of your posting this shit PROVES beyond any doubt that nobody with the resources of a government wants to kill you.  That's means not only is the US government not trying to kill you, neither is the government of any country.

How hard do you think it is to disappear someone when you have the resources of a whole government?

Yes, it's easy to kill a man for the government. But it's not easy to kill a man but let others believe it's a natural death not a murder. Especially when the target knew what they are doing and reveal it in the Internet. That's why they always planned big event to distract the murder plot.

If a government wants to kill you, they don't care if it looks like a murder, and it's simple in most countries - particularly the USA, to write off a murder as just happenstance.  You are not building your case.

katsung47 wrote:

------------------

156. The road map of SARS (8/22)

Toronto is the only city hit hard by SARS outside the Asia. When news reported thousands of people quarantined and quite some died, I was suspicious: was that a coincidence? Toronto is also the only city in Canada I have relative lived. In late April, my parents came back from China. I learned that though SARS was very severe in Beijing, it was more severe in Huhehaote, Inner Mongolia Province where whole mansion were quarantined because of SARS. My uncle lives in Huhehaote, I have cousins live in Beijing, Tentsin and some other parts of China. They knew my story. Dying from SARS will be the best way of elimination without suspicion.

Toronto was not "hit hard" by SARS.  They had a handful of cases and they overreacted, as the often do.  Case in point, some years ago they had about 30 or 40 cm of snow and they called in the army to shovel it, claiming that the snow was causing horrible economic havoc.  This made the people of Toronto into laughing stocks, and they're still the butt of jokes to this day.

In short, the municipal government of Toronto is run by pussies.

Their SARS reaction was similarly derided as excessive, and we still make fun of it.

I live just a few hours down the road from Toronto.  My relatives live IN Toronto, and I bet I have a lot more friends and relatives there than you do.  So don't try to bullshit me about Toronto.  Back your claims with evidence or STFU.

katsung47 wrote:

My relatives who know my story mainly live in China and in Bay area, California. My wife's relatives live in Fujian Province; Phillipine; Hongkong; and Toronto. I looked at the map, SARS contagious area covered most of them. It only avoided Fujian and Shanghai, because there was a designed drug case to be breakout, they must leave a route free of SARS for my wife to go to frame us. That's why SARS became a smart bomb, not attack some area nearby but picked up remote area such like Inner Mongolia and a single city far away: Toronto.

SARS was not a smart bomb.  It was a mildly infectious flu.

katsung47 wrote:

157. Simon drops out and computer worm (8/25)

There is no doubt that my computer is under surveillance of Feds. The agents who monitor on me often post message to my thread. These messages used to be malicious ridicules. There was once an agent even carelessly put his reply before I posting mine. So I know they can see everything on screen as soon as I typing out every word. Sometimes I failed to post a reply to a comment. I clicked "post" button, but the message never show up. Or a notice said "Invalid - session". Or even a ridicule: "Sorry, you may not post at this time. This forum has a waiting period before new members can post a message. Please return in 6 hours to post." (I was not new member though). It always took place when I made a reply which was too sharp which I thought had offended the watching agent.

Dude, the people who post messages to your threads ridiculing you are not agents.  They are sane people who think you're a whackjob.  If I were you, I'd be much more worried about people who post messages supporting you.  Those people are dangerous, crazy, and unpredictable.

As a point of fact, government staff are generally not allowed to post ridicule because it would be embarrassing if word got out to the news media.  If you're getting shit from someone, it's almost certainly not a federal agent.

Post flood control is normal, and many, many message fora have it.  In your case, however, I would conjecture that the forum owners probably have limited tolerance for your brand of ravings and lock your IP address down a bit.  A simple matter to do and that has nothing to do with federal agents either - it's just normal people defending themselves against your loony behaviour.

Even here, your presence is tolerated only for the entertainment value.  I spend time writing to you in the futile hope that maybe, just maybe, I can trigger that one atrophied brain cell in your warped mind that will snap you back to the real world.

katsung47 wrote:

In 8/22, I wrote a reply "Don't waste time, Simmon will pull out soon of late--- " to a thread "Go Simon, go!" I failed to post it after several trying. I was curious, "It was only a politic opinion. Why ban my post? Maybe my opinion is too true to be posted?" I thought. I always think this Recall is conducted by Feds, apparently the agent knew it already. I planned to repost "Simon will pull out" in my coming postings.

I went back there about 20 minutes later. Found my message was posted and there was an explanation. It said "The Forsite net operations center shut down around noon today and was down until a short while ago. Though I haven't heard from them as to the cause, it's my guess that they were shut down deliberately because of the "sobig" worm."

Umm, no, getting boned by a worm is the sign of a bad or unlucky system administrator, not a federal government plot.

katsung47 wrote:

I was banned from GWM (Government Watch Men) web site early this month. My thread was moved away. Then I received a e-mail "Announcement from Managers of The Government Watch Men"

I'm not surprised.  If you posted this kind of shit on my blog, I'd ban you too, except I wouldn't email you - not because the fed would make me not email you but simply because I'm just a dick about stuff like that.

katsung47 wrote:

Obviously a powerful manager overcame the others and banned people without reason (with the reason he couldn't speak out). Original managers resigned and left for another site. Since I was unbanned, I re-registered in GWM. I found a message about URL of new site ex-manager went.(Free Speech for all) In it effbeeye said, " ..it is definitely a site that will adhere to free speech rules - ....until of course the manager wakes up from his coma and figures out what's going on!!!"

Which means "eff be eye" will wake up ex-managers from their belief of free speech. I went to the site "Free Speech for All". And found it was polluted by junk messages. Someone nicknamed See_I_aye, effbeeye.... occupied the forum, I list a part of it:

Free Speech meens Free For all 8 ...................... See_I_aye 8/25/2003 7:30 AM

You do understand that the First Amendment of the US constitution applies only to the government, and private individuals can make up whatever rules they want for their message boards?  Stated plainly, "free speech" doesn't apply to message boards that aren't run by the government, and even on the ones that are, it is not a restriction on free speech to limit people to the intended topics of the forum.

When you're off topic, you get banned.  It's that simple.  It's not a matter of free speech.

katsung47 wrote:

Who have the ability and motive to do this? I think no others can than Ashcrofts cyber space team. The rogue team who have the power to ban people(even managers) without reason. And have the resource to harass the site they dislike. They are paid to this kind of work. When Ashcroft insistently demand more and more power by "Patriot Act", "Victory Act", what they deal with is not terrorist but innocent American people and target at Free Speech. Is that a crime? Is First Amendment a law? Why these agents can be so ruthless to violate other's right? Even don't bother to put their name hinted they are intelligence?

Ashcroft doesn't have a cyberspace team.

And nobody needs special powers to ban people from a message board.

And if it wasn't a government board, free speech and the first amendment don't apply.

katsung47 wrote:

159. The second wave of SARS outbreak in Toronto (8/31)

In 1992, I was puzzled for sometime when I had been hurt by isotope money. I never touch drugs. Why did Feds trace my cash? With more experience I gradually realized they are looters. Erny's death made me realize that if one has too much cash, he would be the target and the result would be death. (See message "7. Alleged murder of Erny")

Provide evidence that your money was traced or that the gov kills rich people.  Copies of reports on the traces of your money should have been easy to obtain through access to information legislation.  As a point of interest, by what method would they trace your cash?  I'm quite curious how they'd do that.

Since the second richest man in the world lives in the USA, and it's fair to say that he has more fucking cash than you'll ever dream of, and he's still alive, I call bullshit.

I think the third richest man in the world lives in the USA too.

katsung47 wrote:

There was no arrest in Canada. In 5/28, it said, "They arrested 30 suspects in China, US, Canada and India.". Obviously, the latest SARS outbreak came with the latest arrest of drug gangs.

When they planned a framed drug case, they always create a regional link between criminals and victims. Such like let my wife buy an apartment in Xianmen, Fujian. So to my relative in Toronto, they must have developed a drug gang. SARS was designed to elimination. So this time they used it to kill to loot. Drug case is always involved with large amount of money. Only drug dealers knew where the cash was hide, as well as drug agents. Killing the drug dealer and took the money, no one else would know the embezzlement.

No, Toronto is a city of about 5 million people in the metro area and has plenty of drug gangs.  Nobody needs to frame up any pretend drug lords.  History has shown the police to be insufficiently competent at framing anyone.  If you know of someone who got arrested for drugs, rest assured that they more than deserved it.

SARS only killed a handful of old and already sick people.  A healthy person getting SARS would be mildly annoyed for a few weeks, and there are a million better ways to off a drug lord than trying to give him a disease and hoping it will be fatal... "drug overdose" comes to mind at the top of the list, followed by "gangland slaying"

katsung47 wrote:

Though newspaper didn't say where the arrest was made in Canada, I am sure it was in Toronto. And among the deaths in second SARS outbreak, I believe some were drug dealers or people related to them. That was why there was a second wave of SARS illness in Toronto even though Canada has a much better health system then Asia, even though at the same time SARS was contained in China and HongKong,

Toronto, Montreal or Vancouver would be the likely locations.  That's where most of our drug arrests are.

Why was there a second wave?  Because fucking sick people from Asia fly to Toronto all the time.  We even implemented thermal imaging to keep people with fevers off planes so we wouldn't fly their festering carcasses to other places.

opsec wrote:

I'm sure that was cathartic Peco, but in this case simple ridicule is easier and neither more or less effective than reasoned debate.

I know, but I had some free time while my iPad was updating.

peco wrote:

If you posted this kind of shit on my blog, I'd ban you too...

Speaking only for myself, I have no interest in banning Kathaksung.  You are free to continue arguing with him, if you wish.

square wrote:

peco wrote:

If you posted this kind of shit on my blog, I'd ban you too...

Speaking only for myself, I have no interest in banning Kathaksung.  You are free to continue arguing with him, if you wish.

I'll second that. Everyone here pisses off some other at times, it's all part of the seductive charm of the place. Kat has been adopted by High Street for whatever reason, and I can't see banning him now. If you don't like to read his posts, do what I do when fnord posts anything with 'chimp' in the title.

I very much doubt that facts are anything of an obstacle to Kat.

Oh that site is too good.

You are a banana moon subverting the sun.

Good thing there's a three-day weekend coming up...

166. Control state with their own candidate

Insider group controls media and politicians, even manipulates Presidents. President Kennedy was assasinated; President Nixon was impeached and almost so was President clinton.

Now it seems they preferred to have their own patsy. Such like Ventura in Minnesota, Schwarzenneger in California and Wesley Clark for the Demo's president candidate. These people have one thing in common, that is they have no experience of politics. So they became a plain puppet, handled by the men behind them. Arnold Schwarzenneger ducked debates which needed imminent question and answer but only attended one which the question had been given in advance. This may prove he has little knowledge of government and politics in his brain but can only recite the answers previously taught by his handlers. The result of Ventura being Governor of Minnesota was clear. That Demo lost mid-election in 2002 which they shouldn't lost. (See message "151. Development of California recall") I don't know if it is another coincidence but the hacker teenager scapegoat was found in Minnesota too. Everybody knows it's easier to set up a case in a land where regime is fully controlled.

With the help of intelligence, Arnold will steal the chair of California Governor. And the Florida 2000 election or Minnesota 2002 mid-election will repeat in California, I can foresee.

167. The frame case is going on (9/26/03)

In messages 152, 153, 154 I talked about in early August, I suffered heavy harassment in internet. Especially in 8/11 and 8/12 when I was blocked to internet almost whole day. Which gave me a feeling that I might"disappear" from some "operation". Later I knew this could be another frame attempt.

On 8/17, in a family re-union, B (my brother in law), who just came back from New York told us such a story. There was a strike in New York harbour which lasted for more than a month. It was not a big one because only one dock was involved. Which happened to be the dock his shipping company loading the cargo. So in early August when the strike was over, there were 24 containers released to B's company . Just then, two employees quit the job. B hired two temporary workers, after two days, they quit too. At last, only one employee was available. B had to work with him to unload the cargo. "It's really hard work, but I made it. We two even unloaded an umbrella container in 39 minutes. " He said. After everything was done. There came the great blackout,(8/14) B said he had to slept one night in warehouse without air-condition.

The days B was forced to unload the cargo were the days I suffered internet attack. (8/11 and 8/12) Feds is expert to arrange strike and employee's work to make a case develop to their way. I know the main merchandise B imported were suitcase which were from Shanghai. But I don't know where the umbrella came from. I then had a speculation..... Later when I met my sister again, I asked her where was the manufactory the umbrella they imported from. I was right. It was from Fujian. Now the dot is connected. B imported umbrella from Fujian, China. So FBI, DEA and Chinese secret police cultivated a drug gang based in Fujian. The rest story I've written in message 142, 143, 146, 150. In May they arrested the drug gang. Now they have 77 tons of drugs which can ship at any time to frame a case. The August one was the latest. In which through organizing dock strike, employee resignation, they forced B to unload the cargo by himself. I think there were drugs in umbrella box, so they can arrest him "unloading drugs"? Why they didn't do it, left it soured like several former soured frame cases, remain puzzle for me. But they did do everything. Include Organizing dock strike, employee's resignation, worm "Blaster" internet attack, and elimination.

In July, I smelled an odour. I went to kitchen, my father in law told me he was boiling Chinese medicine. Someone advised him to do so to cure his coughing. Almost at sametime, someone else gave my wife a juice prescription, said it was good for health. So my wife bought a juice machine and almost drank "health juice" everyday in July. I refused to drink it, because some vegetable were from "free food". It was from lady V. Like G-lady, V introduces customers to travel company to earn commission if they buy tickets. V also is a volunteer in welfare organization. These free food were from the organization she worked. I seldom touch these food. Because of my particular situation, I'm afraid of poison.

In early August, my father in law became very sick. He couldn't eat anything, even couldn't drink milk. Then my wife got sick too. She had a severe diarrhoea for one week. . The symptom looked like it was cancer.Because it took place at the time I suffered from internet attack, I worried that they were poisoned by eating material which caused cancer. Though my wife and her father insisted it was a coincidence, they abandoned Chinese medicine and "health juice".

This month doctors found there are tumours in my father in law's lung and esophagus. The report of if it is cancer or not will come these days. My wife still brings home the "free food" everyweek. The refrigerator is full. She has to put them on the floor. I never touch them. She hasn't touch them since she got sick in early August. Seeing her throwing the rotten vegetable into garbage can, I wonder why she knew nobody wants it but still keep on bringing it home. Maybe that's a mission someone assigned to her. She even dares not refuse the questionable food and speak out her suspicion. (What she can say is "it's coincidence") When the government label this one "enemy combatant" and that one "terrorist", I found the biggest terrorist is among themselves.

168. Swift response (10/6/03)

In last message I talked about "free food" which was put on the floor. I posted the message on 10/1, next day, the cabbage, onion, pepper were all moved away. Was there material which would cause cancer in it? or was it too unusual a view that vegetable to be laid on floor? I don't know. The vegetable moved away were not found in garbage can. So my wife must have taken it to somewhere else. The swift and unusual treatment of "free food" ensured me that it was an action to eliminate evidence.

When B told about his story in New York, he said first to me, "I know you'll link it to Feds again, but I think it's coincidence." They have suspicion but dare not say anything. B always said, "I've done nothing wrong, there is no reason they hurt me." But because they know my story, and could be witness against Feds, (I think Feds had contacted all my relatives and acquaintance for information and cooperation). For Feds' own safty, they'll eliminate potential witness against them. Just like Malvo and Muhammad, they might think they worked for Feds, never thought of being framed as snipers. Or like Kennedy's family. To prevent JFK's brothers to be elected as US President, they assassinated Robert Kennedy and propagated a scandal to stop Edward Kennedy to join president campaign. And the early death of Jacklin Kennedy and accidental death of their son, Kennedy Jr. , were all methods to prevent any possible investigation in the future.

My father in law has had a X-Ray examination when he had eating problem. Doctors said they found nothing wrong from X-Ray picture. When he was unable to drink in early August, (he was better after he stopped drink Chinese Medicine and "health juice") we arranged him for a stomach mirror inspection. It was on 9/8. Doctor found there was a tumour in his esophagus. But Lab report said it was not a cancer. Doctor is an expert, to his experience he said it looks like a cancer and he doubted lab's report. He asked for a second thorough examination on 9/28. Lab's report is still negative on cancer but doctor found more tumour in lung of My father in law. He is now staying in hospital for further examination.

169. Development of Regime change in San Jose Police

In message #148, I talked about due to the pressure of a "shooting death" case, (in which County's D.A. and FBI unsusally intervened) San Jose police chief Lansdowne took another job in San Diago within 10 days after the case happening though he has made no mistake and the case looks like an ususal one. (Police used to quit such kind of charge) Then newspaper said Tom Wheatley took the chair of San Jose Police Chief. "Was he Feds' favourable candidate?" I thought. He was not.

On Oct. 3, Mercury News reported Wheatley won't seek the permanent chief position in part of his health. Article:

"Cops dealing with setbacks
Acting S.J. Chief to retire; Officers dies: another hurt
By Roxanne Stites, Mercury News
.....
Officers and other staffers are worring over Acting Police Chief Tom Wheatley's recent illness and sudden decision to retire. They're thankful that officer Ed Marini is recovering after he was struck by a car last month while directing traffic. They're facing the grind of their profession and their own vulnerability after veteran officer Rogelio Moreno, 45, suffered a fatal heart attack while shopping with his children.
.....
details of the health problems that have hospitalized Wheatley were not disclosed.
......
"When you look at this job and you see your fellow officer having a heart attack at a young age, another officer almost losing his life after being struck by a car, and your chief in the hospital, it's a reality check." said Rose, "It causes you to realize that no matter how rewarding the job can be, it can take a tremendous toll on you.""

Tom Wheatley is only 52. When he took the job of Police Chief several weeks ago, he vowed to do his best to serve San jose residents. Suddenly, he decided to retire. And S.J.P.D. looked like to be suffered from a spell. Officers still young suffered from disease, accident, death.

But I know it's not a spell. It's a plot to control San Jose P.D. The dull article itself is more like an intimidation. I alleged Feds created all these events. Heart attack now become the murder method they used to use. (see message "5. Microwave killing"). The blood clot in vessel caused by microwave radiation takes hour to form or moving to the heart. There is a time delay from action to death. So made the heart attack more like a natural one. All events were created to intimidate the S.J. police force. Tom Wheatley finally realized this power and bent before it.

The attempt to control the judicial system and law enforcement force in San Jose Area is very aggressive these days. Which I can only say my SARS analysis is too accurate that they can't bear it. While my revelation of DC sniper case is only a domestic one, my SARS analysis is international. The high ranking inside group must be mad. With high pressure, agents behaved so violently, made San Jose area a battle field of extortion.

170. Suspends Coroner (10/11)

Same day (10/3), on the same page of reporting the death, illness, accident, resignation of San jose police force, (see message #169) there was also an article about the suspension of a coroner. re:

"County suspends coroner
Reasons unclear for paid leave of at least 2 weeks. Gregory Schmunk, Santa Clara chief medical examiner, hired four years ago to clean up a troubled coroner's office, was put on paid leave indefinitely Thursday after recent criticism over an old theft charge against him." (S.J.M.N. 10/3/03)

The article and the article in next day (10/4), said Schmunk had been accused of stealing more than $400 in medical books when he left his job as brown County medical examiner four years ago. But the charge was dismissed after he sent a $406 check to his former employer.

He was also accused of failing to disclose, as required by law, that he had been involved in a lawsuit when he applied a gun permit in 1999. The lawsuit was a civil complaint in which he threatened a Sacramento co-worker. But he paid $2,500 in 1995 and had settled that dispute.

Another accusation is he spent $42,000 in travel expenses over past three years. "That raises question about his judgement, given the county's budget situation."

The San Jose Mercury requests Schmunk to resign based on these charges either is on minor matter or is unnecessary.(10/10) Arnold Schwarzenegger has committed more serious offenses of series groping women but inside group can still send such a villain to be a Governor. Schmunk, just like former Governor Davis, made no offense, is being ousted because Feds need a patsy of their own.So Feds can commit a plot.

At same time they also indicted a judge and an ex-cop of conspiracy. When the newspaper was full of these unusual reports, I can feel Feds activate a large resource to extort the judicial system in San Jose area. From judge, police officer to coroner, they try to control everything. Once extortion taking place, the purpose is always malicious. I believe a new frame case is on going. Police killing will happen. And target is me.

Of one thing there can be no doubt:  Kathaksung lives in a terrifying world, and I often wonder how he has the courage to get out of bed each morning.

171. Extort judge (10/16)

On 9/10, Mercury News reported a case against a judge: "Judge - Secret probe begins". In about one month period, there were 11 days followed this case with big article.

Judge Danser is accused of fixing traffic tickets for sports figures and acquaintances in past three years, (20 tickets issued to 17 people), dismissed nearly $4,700 in fines for offenses ranging from speeding to not wearing a seat belt. The ticket case used to be processed in traffic court, Danser transferred these cases to his criminal court and dismissed them. But there is no evidence show that Danser benefit from it personally. So on 10/10, newspaper said, "Why they allegedly did it. To be a "big man," prosecutors allege. "This is all about power.... being able to pull favors for people."

Judge Danser defended himself it's all for the "interest of justice". In court practice, he has the right to do so. He did nothing criminal.

At first I thought the prosecutor might have strong evidence against Judge Danser. But when it turned out their conclusion is Judge doing it to be a "big man" which is totally a speculation. The whole case becomes a reluctant one. The densely reported case seems to me more like an extortion with the word "secret probe", "booked with felony charge", "If convicted, face maximum three years in prison." It forms a pre-trial, a media trial.

Experts say that criminal investigations against judges in California are a rarity. "Some defense attorneys questioned the district attorney's highly unusual decision to convene a grand jury to investigate a local sitting judge. Some suspect politics." (S.J.M.N. 9/21)
"Unlike the majority of his colleagues, Judge Danser has been proud to demonstrate his independence from the DA'S office," said defense attorney L. Harmon, also a former prosecutor. "It is no secret, either to him or anyone else, that the DA's office did not like him. So they found a way to get rid of him." (S.J.M.N. 9/26)

This is it. DA need judge to be their rubber stamp. Since Feds plot a framed case, they need judge's cooperation to sign warrant to search and arrest. Now they suspended a judge and a coroner, either in a reluctant case or even something totally unnecessary. The timing is not a coincidence. They even extort and intimidate San Jose police force in violent way. (covertly) It seems they are planning a new frame case in coming months. Insider group scare the pants off of my revelation. They scare of that I'll reveal more.

172. Crazy persecution (10/20)

Though there were two negative report from lab about the tumour my father in law having, the doctor, with rich experience, insisted for a third expanded examination. In early October, hospital confirmed my father in law had a cancer. About a week later, my uncle (my mother's brother) living in Shanghai was said had cancer too. I can feel Feds speed up the persecution. Especially come with the recent news of unusual charge on local judge, coroner and police force.

The trial date of Judge Danser was set at 10/20. The 10/3 news reported the Coroner was suspended for at least two weeks which means decision would be made after 10/17. According to the experience that they had set the trial date of S.F.P.D. high ranking official the same day of my wife's travel date at 4/18, (The charge was dropped 4 days after I posted my doubt on 3/31) I think there will be a frame case taking place around 10/20.

My mother had scheduled to fly to Shanghai on 10/18 but later changed the date to 10/23. My wife's brother will come to visit his cancer sickened father on 10/24 from Toronto. (The one I think has been the target of SARS elimination in Canada) The most unusual thing was last night at 10 o'clock,(4/19) Mao's son came to my house to pick up his air ticket. It was an old tactic repeated by Feds again and again to establish a link between targets. (see #117. and # 121. ) His flight date is 4/23 too. I think all these were arranged by Feds. And they plan a framed case at this week-end.

Just at 7 pm tonight, (10/21) a stranger knocked at the door, gave me an envelope, said it's for my wife. That's something never happened before, of course, I refused. The eagerness to frame a case come to a crazy level.

173. Timing of SARS (10/21)

10/16/02: The bill to authorize President Bush to use military force in Iraq was signed. 11/16/02. One month later, the first SARS case was found in Guangdong Province, China. Nobody noticed it at that time.
January 2003: In Guangzhou, a super spreader who had flu like illness infected dozens of medical workers. This caused panic. The flu medicine was sold out in market. The panic lasted only a few days then diminished after government announcing everything was under control.
February 03: Hongkong stock and option market attacked. Hongkong currency attacked. The attack lasted 3 months.

But Iraq war couldn't delay. Because the hot summer weather(starts from May) was not fit for invade troops. If the war was estimated as long as two months, then it should start on March. Thus we saw the big outbreak of SARS in early March. The dramatic Johnny Chen's case caught the eyes of world. (see #134. From MARS to SARS, an intelligence work of revelation.) On 3/18, S.J.Mercury News reported,"CDC investigating mysterious illness that has afflicted more than 150 people in seven countries and caused nine deaths." Among them there was Frankfurt, Germany which embedded the cause of future outbreak of SARS if there had been a strong opposition when Iraq war started. Germany, along with France were the old Europe who opposed Bush's war. On 3/21, US and British Army invaded Iraq. The war went on smoothly. On 4/9, Baghdad was fallen. The success of war might have saved Europe from a SARS disaster.

174. Interest exchange

There is no formal statistic of death cases of SARS. According to newspaper, it was about 800. Among them: China: 349 (S.J.M.N.7/30), Hongkong: 299(World Journal, 9/11), Taiwan: 72 (W.J. 8/23), Canada 44 (W.J. 8/16), Singapore: 32 (W.J. 8/23) Vietnam; Thailand, Phillipine, Malaysia: each was under 5. China and Hongkong were the heaviest sufferer.

The economy of Hongkong seriously damaged by SARS. On 7/1, there was an anti-new security act protest on street, (500,000 people joined protest), Since Hongkong taken over by China in 1997, it suffered South-east financial crisis, two bird-flu attacks and SARS attack. Economy slowed down, unemployment was up. Media criticize the administration was incompetent, demand a regime change.

Hongkong was a former British colony, if the chief administrator stepping down, most suitable successor would be old official cultivated by Britain. It is clear who will be benefit from it. On 7/22, World Journal said that Beijing noticed that around the great protest of 7/1, many foreign intelligence agents arrived in Hongkong, some were from Taiwan. Beijing also noticed unusual gathering of British intelligence officers that former high ranking administrator of Hongkong, Hord (who came from British intelligence MI-6), had arrived in Hongkong in late May. As well as some former "psychology war" advisers. One of them said if Hongkong government was unable to solve the problem, there would be more larger scale protest. The pressure to change Hongkong regime was high.

Iraq war is an unjust war. Why British government joined US in this aggression despite the opposition of British people? It's obvious there was an interest exchange. In which US started a bio-attack to shake and awe Hongkong regime while Britain joined US in war to change regime of Iraq. So we saw that SARS outbreak was followed immediately by Iraq war in March. You help me hit Hongkong and I help you hit Iraq.

In the end there was a successful regime change in Iraq. But they failed in Hongkong. Under the pressure, two high ranking ministers, security chief and financial chief stepped down. But China preserved Tong JianHua as Chief administrator. China also passed friendly economic treaty and loosened the travel restriction of its citizens to Hongkong to help this island city to recover from the damage of SARS.

175. SARS and China (10/31)

Two cities were the target of SARS when it broke out in early March. But people didn't know Beijing except Hongkong was hit hard by the disease. Because Chinese government censored the information. So there was another dramatic revelation in early April. (see #134. From MARS to SARS, an intelligence work of revelation.) Several days later, two high ranking Chinese government officials stepped down.

What kind of role Chinese secret police played in this event? I think they knew it. When SARS broke out in early March, there was a People's Delegation Convention in Beijing. In which former president Jiang Zi Ming retired, left the chair of President to Hu Jing Tao. But people said Jiang Zi Ming was unwilling to do so. He still kept another important post: Chairman of armed force. Public opinion said Jiang was waiting to see new president in trouble so he could take back the lost power. SARS crisis, disturbance in Hongkong, if new president coudn't deal with it, Jiang Zi Ming might take the chance to come back. It was a power struggle. In which secret police chose a side they preferred to.

1. The spreading of SARS needed assistance of intelligence in remote area such like Inner Mongolia, Gan Su province, Si Chuan Province where I have relatives living .

2. The dramatic revelation in April was a result of intelligence work. Doctor Jiang, also visited his daughter in US this July. Because he was a key figure in revelation, Such a sensitive visit must be the result of agreement of intelligence of two countries.

3. There was a big protest (500,000 people took part in) in Hongkong on 7/1. New Beijing government was told it was only a small one in advance and had neglected this crisis. ( The report of pre-estimation was that less than 100,000 people would attend the demonstration.) Was it the incompetence of Chinese intelligence, or was it a deliberate misleading?

4. Former Chinese president Jiang ZiMing left Beijing to Shanghai during SARS crisis. He seemed knew Shanghai was a non-SARS area. Public opinion criticized him that Jiang Zi Ming hid in safe place to watch new government struggle with SARS disease.

5. There was no doubt Chinese secret police joined FBI and DEA in a framed drug case in FuJian Province. SARS was planned to eliminate the people whom knew my story. (see message 142, 143, 150, 155, 156, 159 - 162, 164)
In the report of San Jose Mercury News of 3/18 might reveal their intention. It said mysterious illness was found in seven countries: they were Germany; Canada; Singapore; Thailand; Vietnam; Hongkong; Phillipine. Among them Thailand and Vietnam were the only two countries I've sought asylum when I was drifted in South-east Asia. Hongkong; Phillipine and Canada were three places where I have relatives lived. If my wife had gone to FuJian on 4/18, the drug case would have been broken out earlier. There would have been also a big SARS outbreak and there would have been a lot of death. (More death to cover up the designated murder death)

181. Soup (11/21)

Poisoning is a traditional method to murder. There is no exception for Feds. But they do it in different way. They made it more like a natural disease or sometimes, directly plant virus or germ to the victims.

Sometime about 92 (? If I can't remember the exact time, I put a "?") my wife started to suggest me to go to the restaurant which Mr. X owned. Mr. X was a seller in Flea market. I thought he was an informant of Feds so I refused. My wife kept suggesting to go to Mr. X's restaurant although she knew I didn't like him and that restaurant was far away from our house. Her repeating suggestion caused my suspicion. What was it for?

One day when I was having meal with my wife, she took out two cups of soup. She gave me one "This beef soup is for you. I have that WonTon soup. I bought them from Mr. X's restaurant."

The long accumulated suspicion broke out. I was angry. "You know my opinion about Mr.X. Why are you keeping request me to eat his food? Is there something in the soup? You drink it." I pushed the beef soup cup to her.

My wife didn't say a word. She sat there, lowered her head, dare not to watch me. When I urged her " drink it, why you dare not drink it?" She had a strange reaction. She held a piece of chopstick, soaked it into the beef soup, then slowly put the chopstick into her mouth. She might drink a drop of soup or even less. Obviously she was forced to do so. So she herself suspected the soup might have been poisoned. That's the only way she could do then. Looked like tasting a little soup.

After my anger relaxed, I realized my wife was forced to do so. I hurried finish the meal. Left her behind to take care of that full cup of beef soap. Later when I got familiar with Feds tactic, I know that even she drank the whole cup of soup. Nothing would happen.

182. Sandwich

when I went to Galt Market every Tuesday then, I used to buy my lunch a day before from a Vietnamese food store. The customers were Asian people because the food was traditional Asian style. So it caught my eye when I saw a white man in sandwich cabinet whom was talking with sales ladies. The white man left right away when he saw me coming in. I felt it was unusual because he left without buying anything.

I told the sales ladies I want three sandwiches. The sales ladies looked flurried, turned their sights away and walked away to take care other customers whom came later. I was left alone for a few minutes. It was a deliberate negligence, I was angry. Then another saleslady just coming from other room picked my order. She took three already made sandwiches from a saving cabinet for me. It was unusual because they always made it on order. (customer could choose different meat and vegetables) The odd things puzzled me. It seemed they got these sandwiches particularly prepared for me.

Next day, after a busy morning, I was hungry. Looking at the sandwiches, I recalled the strange scene the day before and beef soup event. Did they put some poison in sandwich? I tried a small bite, taste is normal, than another bite.... I finished a sandwich, threw away the other two and waited for something to happen. Nothing happened.

It was contradict to my suspicion of poisoning. The above two events puzzled me for sometime. What happened exactly?

183. Imminent threat (11/23)

I break the sequence to write this. I think D.o.J. and FBI now may try to plant computer crime on me after they failed the other framing attemption.

In late October, my wife's brother came here to visit his cancer sickened father. He is a business man trading second hand computers and softwares. When he came to my house. He did two things. First, he talked about US dollars that it would devalue so it was better to change US dollar into other currency. Then he used my computer to check E-bay to see if his merchandise had been sold. He told me it was easy to make money in internet trading. I thought he was manipulated by Feds to influence me. I got used to this kind of tactics. 1. It's just like Isotope money, a method to detect how much money target have so they can loot. 2. Feds wish I do business in internet.

I don't care much about devalue US dollar because I am not rich. But I am sensitive to that internet business suggestion. I felt in advance Feds would use internet crime to frame me. This was another effort they try push me into the trap.

For a long time I was accused of spamming to post this thread because I post in many different sites. The accusation of spamming is unreasonable. Would Bush be a spammer if many web sites posting his speech of State Union? Or is the same book appear in different libraries a spam?

A few months ago, the spamming accusations on me suddenly disappeared. At the same time I saw many articles in Mercury News blaming spam and demand strict law against it. Since media is controlled by intelligence. I always can testify the intention of inside group. And this time they want an anti-spamming law for their private purpose to frame their dislike. Of course they got the law passed locally and nationally. Among them, the anti-spamming law in California is the most strict one.

Though I don't do any business in internet, I fear Feds will plant a framming case on me. They have such ability and resource.

I said I was under 24 hours surveillance by Feds. I was harassed by their cyber space team. I have reason to allege them doing so.

1. Long time ago, I logged in each forum automatically if I chose the function box of automatic log in. Now I failed most of them. So each time I have to manually log in. It may prove that my computer is under control of another server. I must enter internet through that server. So the automatic log in is defuntioned.

2. Because my messages missing frequently, I record them each time I post so I can track later. I noticed such a phenomenon. After I posting a message, the number of viewer column always increased by 2 not one. (e.g. when the view total was 100 before I click the thread, after I sent the message, it became 102 not 101) Which means there is another computer or server was on the thread synchro- locked with my computer. This observation never failed. It works automatically.

3. The monitor agent often communicate with me through forum mostly with malicious ridicules. So I often got an instant reply. Once they had made a mistake that their reply even posted before I posted mine. (when I finished writing and left for something else before posting it.) So I knew they can see the same view in my screen.

4. In early time when I just started to post in internet, (about year 2000 and 2001), I found my thread was filtered off from other readers. I discovered it when I enter the forum as a guest. I couldn't find my thread. But the thread appeared if I logged in with my name. So a person maybe cheated that he is in a discuss forum while in fact no other people is able to see his messages. It takes place when his computer is under the control of another special server which filters it from the connection to internet. I proved this by using another line.

I went to T's computer. (Tenant who rented my room then) He had a seperate phone line. With his permission I used his user's name to go to the site. I couldn't find my thread. T, faced the fact, admitted it was possible I was under FBI surveillance. (Though I alleged he is an Chinese undercover, too.)

I was puzzled at that time if they could control my computer, they can control T's computer too. So their secret won't been discovered. It was easy to switch the line connection for them. Until they pushed through "Patriot Act" I knew why. Originally, FBI must got Judge's permission to monitor suspect's phone line. It limited the only line suspect using. So when I tested in T's line, their trick was revealed. That's why they demand a vast power of electronical surveillance in "Patriot Act". They succeeded. Now Feds can abuse their power to harass people without judge's permission at the reason only they suspicious. The "Patriot Act" does little to terrorism but vastly hurt civil liberty and cover up the corruption of D.o. J.

Since I am very careful not to fall in trap they set up. How can Feds frame me in internet frame case?
Planting.

5. Spread fake messages assuming my name and use my internet address. See "132. plant fake petition.(5/22)", "127. Heavy harassment (5/3)".

6. Assuming my internet address. Technically they have no problem to send fake messages from my address and use my phone line. They have done so before. Several times I was banned from web-sites. After my protest, the web host said it was a mistake. Because they found someone else in same server address of mine sent harassing messages. Here is one example: (Host's explanation)

#207714 - 12/24/02 11:14 AM Edit Reply Quote
"Actually kathaksung wasn't banned, it only appeared that he had been and had the same effect as if he had been. It was another person who was actually banned but who was on the same IP address, that IP address has now been unbanned as it covered more than one person. Had kathaksung e-mailed Gunslinger about it the matter would have been sorted out."

I felt it was an imminient threat because recently, my wife wants to install broad band DSL. Because with which several people can go to internet at same time, I fear Feds may take the chance to plant fake messages on me and rejected the idea.

Then three days ago, a telephone company mail showed my wife installed a new phone line without my awareness. I had a discussion with my wife but failed to persuade her abandoning the new phone line. I think it's a Fed's manipulation. It makes a plant possible. Even if I am home alone and surfing in internet, they could accuse that criminal messages sent from another computer from another line was from the same house and I am the only person in the house. (My daughter has another computer)

Two days ago, news from World Journal "Federal sweep computer crime, 125 arrested"
A.G. Ashcroft announced on Oct 20 that government in "Operation Cyber Sweep" they arrested 125 cyberspace criminals, including hackers, ID thief and other swindlers. Suspects also include those immitate software, illegal selling Honour Medals in internet, or invading web site to send patriot information.

Combine all these with crazy persecution, I feel this time D.o.J. will plant cyber space crime to frame me. I announce here I won't do any business in internet, or do anything threatening others or illegal things in internet except the thread in forum to reveal the corrupt and criminal things committed by government. I don't send any private e-mail to anyone except the e-mail to host if harassing happened.

D.o.J. and Ashcroft are crazy. Their eagerness to frame me may reveal their fear. One of the reasons I think is: a coming explosion of housing bubble.



184. Jobless recovery (12/1)

About as early as 2000 or 2001, when I logged in to the forum of Delphi group, I noticed the loggin name sometimes became kathaksun1, or kathaksun2. I have never used such a user's name. At that time I had no knowledge of spamming or someone assuming my name. I thought it might be the software error of Delphi. And if I was able to log in automatically, I didn't care much of it.

A week ago, I was refused from visiting Savant society which is a member of Delphi group. The reason is I have more than one user's name. They listed the above 2 and another one. I do have another user's name, sungkathak. Because when I was banned for no reason, I had to log in with another name to complain. But kathaksun1 and kathaksun2 are not mine. I've posted in Savant society for more than a year, never had a problem. Why they suddenly made trouble for me on this issue?

It took place at the same time of "cyberspace crime" threat. The two names, originally were used by agents monitoring on me, I think. And the names might have been used to post harassing articles, which had caused me being banned from many forums. Now they intend to use it to frame a cyberspace crime.
--------------
My wife suddenly ordered another telephone line, telephone company got it connected, but because the plug of phone line (inside house) is broken and my wife doesn't know how to fix it. So the line was still not used.

Why does Feds want a new phone line? Technically they have no problem to plant on the line I'm using. Because in that old line, there are plenty of my messages revealing how Feds frame a case, include "cyberspace crime". How could they make jury or judge believe their word with such evidence? With a new line, with no other record except their "evidence", they can frame a case.

The pressure on my wife is so heavy that she threatened to move out and now it's "divorce" to me. Why Feds is so eager to finish this case even using a rogue's way? I think it's the 2004 president election.

Bush is a favorite of inside group. They want him to stay for the 2nd term. But he did nothing good. So the only way inside group can do is to give him a prosperous economy. That's why media beat the drum to propaganda the economy is recovering "Growth is now super-super strong compared to super strong,'', "U.S. 3rd-Qtr GDP Grew at 8.2% Rate, Fastest Since '84". Do you feel this super-super strong recovery? Pay-check raised? Employment fully? Or only impression from media?

A fully recovery means high employment, rising income. Company must expand their business. All these need capital, will cause a rising interest in financial market. But FBI is holding a large amount of real estate property. Any interest rising will increase their monthly payment to the loan, and will also cause a housing market price collapse. Nothing can hurt Feds' interest. So Federal interest maintains at 1%. And Bush administration can only invent a new word," jobless recovery". But jobless recovery can't cheat people. That's why I am persecuted so violently.

185. How hard they worked to maintain Bush's fame.

Inside group tried their best to keep Bush's fame. It reflected how they prepared for Bush's state visit to London.

Bush's Britain visit is a controversial one. And was opposed by most Britons. British government and Royal family were reluctant to entertain such a notorious guest. so they were intimidated. Bush is a proxy of Israel, he has done good to Israel by activate Iraq war, he should have an honorable trip according to that interest group. Then we see how high ranking of Great Britain bent to the pressure. 1. The leaking of information that Princess Diana's death was designed by British intelligence and Royal family. That targets at British intelligence. 2. Tony Blair went to hospital for heart trouble. Target at P.M. 3. News of Prince Charles's scandal with his servant. Target at Royal family. All these took place at the time just before Bush's visit. And Great Britain obeyed.

Bush had a glorious state visit. He stayed in Royal's palace in London and welcomed by Royal family. And "Guardian" issued a so said poll "Majority welcome Bush's visit" which was spread vastly in internet by intelligence accessaries. All this is the result of work of intelligence.

At same time, they also threw out the news of Michael Jackson's molesting case to divert public's attention on how Bush was protested by Britons. That's the tactic intelligence used to do, if you are familiar with them. ( see "64. My Brother in law was targetted." how they use McVeigh's execution to divert a framed drug case)

186. Slow poison (12/6/03) (continue to message 181 and 182)

When I thought over what happened to the sandwich and beef soup. I recalled an article in Readers' digest. It was a story about a defect Russian pilot.

Lt. Viktor Belenko drove a Mig-25 to Nakodate, Japan on 9/6/1976. The Mig-25 was the most advanced fighter in Russia at that time. US experts flied to Japan, dismantled the plane and had a thorough examination. They returned the dismantled Mig fighter to Soviet Union about ten days later. The defect pilot, was under "witness protection" and lived in somewhere US.

I noticed the article talked about that once authority had suspected this was a fake defection because the expert found some most important part of technique were missing in the plane. The article also talked about that Belenko refused a huge rewards. (millions of dollars) He said he wanted to make a living by his own hands. That his defection was not for money but for opinion. It's real incredible for money oriented intelligence, I think.

The thing impressed me most was the pilot was poisoned when he was hidden in witness shelter. Belenko was still young but he was bald. The medical examination concluded that it was caused by slow poison of a kind of rare metal. (I forgot the name of that metal) The article, of course, alleged it to the work of KGB. I don't believe it. Few people would know where the pilot was if he was under "witness protection". And it was easy to identify the person who had access to pilot's food. (Slow poison took a long time work.) Most likely he became a Quinea pig for intelligence in test of slow poison. When he was of no use but a burden for them.

There are many such examples. The most known one were former Phillipine President Marcos, and former Iranian Tsar Barlivie. When they were rulers they were loyal ally of US. Once they lost power and had to drift abroad they became a political burden of US. Because they were ousted by their own people. Barlivie even couldn't find a shelter in US.. They both died in a short time. ( in about three years or less?) Marcos died of kidney failure and Barlivie died of cancer(?)

There are many advantages of slow poison murder. 1. Work covertly. All death are like a natural one. (like diabetes, kidney failure, cancer...) 2. Control the death on will. They can make target getting sick by slow poison, once the death is neccesary for Feds, what they have to do is just increase the dose, the target died to intelligence' demand without causing a suspicion. 3. Deniable. If the lethal dose is 100 gram, they can dilute the actual poison dose at 1 gram each. So it's safe for them even if they were caught. Because it' s not lethal. 4. It's hard to track because the dose each time used is a tiny one.

This explains what happened in sandwich and beef soup story. The people involved behaved strangely. They thought there was something in food. Nobody knew it was a slow poison, and anybody could eat it and nothing would have happened unless they were fed for a long time. Later, I still noticed they slowly poisoned me. I omit the story here because there is more urge information to tell. I'll post them if there is chance.

Though I couldn't feel the poison before. The situation changed this year. Since this July, they aggressively intensified the persecution. Include poison which I think led to the cancer outbroke of my father in law. I can feel uncomfort after eating poisoned food. This is one reason I said they are going crazy. Feds increased poison dose. They are in a hurry

187. Drinking water (12/11/03)

We used to buy drinking water from coin operated water machine stood outside the super market. Sometime in late 2000(?), my wife told me to buy water from a store. She bought a member card there, so when I went to buy water, I only have to tell the staff the name of my wife and needed not to pay. (She bought a membership card there) It was a drinking water store newly opened in shopping center.

In my house, my father in law drank tea which using boiling tap water. My wife rarely drank at home or she drank with boiling water too. Only my daughter and I drank the cold water bought from machine. Sometime at that period my daughter started to drink bottle water. I noticed this because bottle water is much expensive than the water bought from water store. When I saw my wife bought case of bottle water, I thought she was too spoil our daughter to waste money. But I said nothing about it. How could I knew this meant something else?

Then I had a pain in arm bone. As the pain became more frequently happened, I worried. I recalled a news story. Quite a lot of people lived in a city of Japan got a strange illness - bone ache. At last they found it was because their drinking water was polluted by a chemical compound of mercury(forgot the name). Linked this story, the newly opened water store, and I becoming the only person who drank the water from that store. I realized where the problem came from. I stopped drink the water from that store. The pain in bone did not disappeared right away. It faded gradually as time pasted and at last, no more.

It's easy to switch the water supply from normal tank to poisoned water tank. What happened when there were other people buying water at the same time? There is a row of water tap there. I think they don't care. Because each time the dose is small and won't cause immediate problem.

188. Increase the poison dose

I did most kitchen work at home. Every night, there used to be four of us: my daughter, my wife, her father and I had supper together. Since this July, when my wife introduced "health juice", less and less people had supper together, and after my father in law was sick in early August, I was the only one took meal on table.

I noticed my daughter almost didn't eat at home since July. July was summer vacation. Everyday near noon, there always were call from her classmates, she went out until after super. When the school season began, she had special program which required her to stay in school until 8.pm. On week-ends, my wife often took her eat outside. My wife, since then, used to come back after 8.pm. My father in law couldn't eat normally since early August.

I suspected one source of poison came from the "free food". (see "167. The frame case is going on (9/26)"), even I tried not to touch it, I couldn't avoid it all the time. Because there were so much: from bread, cereal, can food, to fresh vegetable like cabbage, onion, mushroom .... and fruit. Frankly I didn't feel any unwell if I ate these food. Probably poison dose was light because more people fed on it. The "free food" supply stopped after I posted message #167.

Another source probably came from "gift food". My wife used to bring home candy, cake, cookie, said it was gift from customers. But in this July, the "moon cake" she brought home was different. (A Chinese cookie for "Moon Festival") I was indisposed after testing a piece of it. Obviously Feds increased poison dose. We shared one piece of moon cake. Nobody touched the rest since. There were four pieces of cake in one tin box. The rest three and another tin remained on dining table for five months untouched. A few days ago they disappeared after I talked about poison.

When I have meals alone at home these days, I felt indisposed. The symptoms are: 1. coughing which may start right away after meal and could last for several hours. 2. Indispose feeling in liver area. 3. Itch at joint area of arm and elbow. ( from lymph?) 4. Red urine. Urine colour is deep yellow like red. ( blood inside?) These may be from different poison because I observed them by separate testing of food.

189. Poison food in super market (12/16)

I have no drive license. (see "64. My Brother in law was targetted".) Food was brought home by my wife. So I went shopping myself by bike. But soon it didn't work too. I still felt the above symptoms. Did they poison food in super markets I went? ( I went to several markets.) I did a test. There is a super market I rarely go because the price is extremely expensive there. (e.g. the egg is 2.60 to 3.25 a dozen compare 0.99 a dozen in Chinese super market, vegetable price are twice or triple expensive) I bought some food there and made a meal. It worked. None of the above symptoms appeared. Which means they go crazy to poison food in super market I frequently go.

How did Feds do it? I found they particularly poisoned the food I used to consume. For example, Tofu and egg, vegetable and fish are the food I bought everytime. I noticed the brand I used to buy was in scarcity. Usually there are bunch of boxes of Tofu in cabinet, piled up high, now the brand I used to buy were only four left when I came. There were 20 column rail of egg, now most were empty when I went there. Or only two fish left which I used to buy. Left me little to choose. They force me buy from limited quantity which were poisoned food.

Another tactic is to lure me in with low price. I have no income so I always buy the cheapest. Once in Chinese super market they marked the cheapest fish even cheaper. It was 1.19 a pound, it marked: "Special today, 0.99 a pound if not fry." (They have a fry service, and I always asked that service) I at that time was aware of their tactic and didn't buy. But I was puzzled at "no fry" mark. Why? I thought it was probably the poison on fish would spread into oil and made my fish not much poisoned after fry. Also it would pollute the other fish asked for fry service.

I tried next time. I picked up two fish and called for service. There were three salesmen with no customers at that time. The one I called for was reluctant at first. He watched at the other two men. The two turned their sight away. One hurried to find some clean work to do and another just walked away. Same scene like what happened in sandwich store 10 years ago. (see "182. Sandwich") The nearest salesman had to attend me. When I told him to fry it, he handed the fish back and said, "it's too frozen to fry". This never had taken place before. All fish are in same cabinet and always covered by fry service. I knew why and just left.

All these happened in recent months. When they failed in other way, Feds aggressively increase the poison dose and distributed the poisoned food to me in a rogue's way. What if other people bought the poisoned food? They don't care. Though the dose was increased, it won't kill instantly. That's one advantage of "slow poison". I don't know if the salesmen knew these fish were poisoned or not. But at least they were told not to fry some kind of fish. (The kind I used to buy)

Because of their strange behaviour I think these salesmen knew me (someone showed my picture to them? Or alert them a few minutes before I arrived at super market?). I don't go to super market often except these two months.

I now have to abandon normal food I used to have and try some other variety randomly.

190. Informant everywhere (12/21)

In early 1990's I found Feds emptied the most community and moved in their own people: agents and their support group, informants, disguised as residents and tenants.

In about 1997(?), in a chat with Grandma Huang, (see "10. The death of old people"), she complained her tenants behaved like villain. They abusing her food stored in refrigerator. When she complained they scolded her. She said one of tenants was a thief, she stole from a nearby super market where she worked.

Grandpa Huang and Grandma Huang were healthy people before. After their children moved out, about in mid 1990's, they got sick. Grandma Huang's illness was kidney failure. I alleged it was the work of Feds. And I also was aware that Feds not only filled the community with their own people, those people also worked in nearby shopping centers.

In January 2001, news paper reported a case. A Photo Clerk tipped police that she saw a picture of an Asian man posing with an arsenal of guns and home made bombs. Police searched DeGuzman's room in north San Jose. DeGuzman was a De Anza Collige student who had sent film to develop. They found home-made bombs and gun in his room, and said he had a plan in his journal that he would bomb his classmates next day to the day when police arrested him.

"DeGuzman's lawyers argued he never planned to carry out the plot and said assembling the arsenal and fantasizing of mass murder were a therapeutic exercise to cope with severe depression." (S.J.M.N.)

DeGuzman was sentenced 7 years in prison.

There are many questions in this case.

1. Is it an illegal search to watch customer's picture?

2. How could such a picture became the cause of a case? To posing with a gun and bomb is popular in drama, or for a weapon-fan's personal preference. Will that kind of picture (holding a gun or bomb) become a cause of search warranty?

3. Why police didn't arrest DeGuzman the day they said he plotted to bomb. (next day to the arresting day) Arresting him when he moved the bomb in his car to the College would have perfectly proved the plot. (paper said police saw in Computer the journal of DeGuzman thus knew his plot in advance.)

4. Now it could be a wrong case because DeGuzman had to choose the easy one in plea bargain. (If he denied any plot but was found guilty by jury, he'll face a life sentence. See "66. Turn innocent into criminal (5/20/2002)")

5. DeGuzman was found guilty based on a plan. (no action) If that stands, then Government should be prosecuted as terrorist, too. The evidence is clear. They had a plan to attack their own people, bombing; sniper shooting.... That's the plan "Operation Northwoods ". (see "109. Beware another terror attack") Why a civilian was found guilty while government can be exempt from it?

I can explain this case. It was a work of Feds. Though the newspaper didn't identify the location, from "Long's drug store" and "shopping center in Berryessa Road" of different reports, I knew the case took place in a photo cabinet of "Longs drugs store" in a shopping center I went sometimes at that time. My bank was in that shopping center. Each time I went to bank, I always went to nearby food store do some shopping. Longs Drugs Store was a few steps away from the bank and a place I went often. And I had developed pictures there.

I think the staffs there were all warned to notice a "minority" if there was any suspicion . The staff who tipped police was a 19 years old daughter of a policeman. Who eagerly reported her discovery after she went through the picture in her counter. I don't think police have the same ability as Feds do to read people's computer screen. DeGuzman's journal was a private one. Do you think he would publicize it in internet? Especially as police said that's a bombing plot? The case from the beginning was an illegal one violated the law of illegal search and arrest of 4th amendment. Only poor people can never get a protection against Feds' abusing power. That's why they dragged the case for nearly two years for trial. (a plea bargain of "life sentence" or "in one year or so, if you behaved good, you will be free", which will you choose?)

It was a case caused by informants Feds arranged there. I was aware of it from the beginning. This case told me how important the 4th amendment was to innocent people, but it was eroded by Patriot Act. Now it's legal for Feds to carry on a secret search and arrest under Patriot Act.

So when I found they poisoned the food in super markets, I had no surprise. I am too familiar with them. That's what mafia does to a witness of their crime. Even the poison food will hurt many people's health. There were similar cases. I'll tell you if there is chance.

196. Islamic terrorist manipulated by government (1/16)

Five months later, on 12/16/99, I was in city of Surabaya, Java, Indonisia. I stayed in a guesthouse. In the sitting room, there was a young man studying a map. We had a chat. He said he came from US and was going to Phillipines. He told me we could go to Borneo by boat.
Then to the east Sabah, from there there was a ship line connecting Malaysia and south part of Phillipines, Mindanao. "Ta, Ta, Ta." his finger jumped on the table, "you get to Phillipines by boat".

But even there was a ship line to Phillipines, I would not go. The bombing of headquarters of "Phillipines FBI" was still fresh in my mind. It was obvious another guidance from Feds. They invited me to Phillipines. They even recognized that I tried to avoid air travel and instructed me a road by sea. What trap was there in Mindanao ready for me?

Four months later, I got the answer. In April 2000, news reported 21 hostages (10 were western tourists) were held by Islamic militants in southeast Asian seas. That was the start of Abu Sayev rebels and other riots in south part of Phillipines. It happened on the travel line I would take if I had taken the advice to go Phillipine by sea.

Later in TV news, I saw the weapons these Islamic rebels using were not knives, old rifles as I thought before. Their weapons were advanced ones like Stallon used in his movie "Rambo".

My suspicion of Feds manipulating Islamic rebels to commit terrorism got proved by the news of military rebellion in Phillipines. On 7/27/03, a group of military mutineers seized a shopping center in Manila, demanded the government resign.

The soldiers claim that:
Quote, "• Senior military officials, in collusion with the Arroyo regime, carried out last March's bombing of the airport in the southern city of Davao, as well as several other attacks. Thirty-eight people were killed in the bombings. The leader of the mutiny,
Lieutenant Antonio Trillanes, claims to have "hundreds" of witnesses who can testify to the plot.

• The army has fueled terrorism in Mindanao by selling weapons and ammunition to the very rebel forces the young soldiers were sent to fight.

• Members of the military and police helped prisoners convicted of terrorist crimes escape from jail. The "final validation", according to Trillanes, was Fathur Rohman al-Ghozi's July 14 escape from a heavily guarded Manila prison. Al-Ghozi is a notorious bomb-maker with Jemaah Islamiah, which was linked to both the Bali and Marriott attacks."

• The government was on the verge of staging a new string of bombings to justify declaring martial law.

http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0815-04.htm

Among the mutineers, some were officials who took part in the battle in southern part of Phillipines against Islamic rebels and had been awarded medals for thier bravery in struggle. When they saw the weapons and ammunitions rebel used were supported by their own government, and that the terrorist bombing were organized by their own government, they rose up to protest.

197. Forced e-mail (1/21)

In a web forum "America's debate", they have a rule that those who referred a quote more than 5 lines will get a strike. Three strikes will cause poster being banned. Poster must e-mail moderator to request strike to be cancelled. Five days ago, I e-mailed a moderator request the removal of strike from me. (see below.)

"Dear ***** (moderator's name)
I request you to remove the two strikes from my account. It's more than 30 days. thank you.

Sincerely

Kat Sung."

Then I worried. I am afraid Feds will take the chance to plant a fake "threatening" e-mail on me. (see "183. Imminent threat (11/23)") Because recently, I found many cases of "forced e-mail". The following messages were found last month request a communication by e-mail.

1. You have been banned from this forum.
Please contact the webmaster or board administrator for more information.

http://www.rumandmonkey.com/discuss/

2. Original NVT FORUM is Now Closed --Please Go To: NVT 2-Last Days

This is a private forum....Please email me for the group password.... editor@newsviewtoday.com
http://www.realtimeworks.com/discus/index.html

3. The administrator of this community has banned you from viewing and posting here. If you feel this is a mistake, please contact the administrator of the community you were trying to access. DO NOT contact ezboard support. This is between you and the community administrator(s).
Thank you.

http://pub57.ezboard.com/ftbz3lfrm1

4. You are not currently a member of this private forum.
If you would like to access this forum, Revolution and don't know the Group Registration Code , send a message to the Forum's Host using the form below. The host should reply to you via e-mail.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/Resolute … ?msg=116.9

These happened within two weeks last month, obviously forced me to have a private e-mail with moderators. I have rich experience being banned and had to ask reason with another user's name. The politeness of invitation by e-mail is the treatment I've ever had. Consider Feds are eager to frame a case on me, I wrote this message in case they plant fake e-mail. My communication is under control of Feds. It's easy for them to change a private e-mail by theirs.

198. Another attempt to frame a case.

Bush's second term depends largely on economy recovery and the drop of unemployment rate. To achieve this it means the interest rate will go upwards. The rising interest rate will cause a slow housing market. Not much time left for Feds to sell their real estates, that's why they are in a hurry. In later December they had big case planned. ( see "191. Framming a case in December (12/26)") There seems to be another one is planned in later January.

1. China announced two computer virus will attack the internet within a week. They expected "Worm-Livra. A" would break out on 24/1, "M-Acid.A" would break out on 25/1. (World Journal, 1/18/04)

Each time there is a framed case on me, there used to be a virus attack came with it.

2. A report of meningitis death. "Athlete apparent meningitis victim", "Basketball player at UC dies suddenly". (S.J.M.N. 1/20/04) It could be a normal disease death. It also could be an intimidation. I've talked about in "message 191" that Feds used to kill by "brain death" in the name of "meningitis"," West Nile" and even "mad cow". The psychological intimidation can anytime become a cover up of real murder if the framed case is really carried on. The athlete's death imply the victim could be a healthy adult. And in this case, the victim is a black girl. Black people used to be scapegoat in Feds' case.

199. Intelligence control terrorism, from gang to terrorist (1/26)

Of course, the conduct of investigation In the case of mutiny of July 2003 in Manila,
was led by the Philippine National Bureau of Investigation (Philipine FBI) and the police Criminal Investigation Detection Group. (S.J.M.N. 7/29/03) And furthermore, "Officials point out, government supports the demand of police to seek the help of FBI of US, to track the source of some advanced weapons." (World Journal, 8/5/2003) When murderer became investigator, you can expect there will be no true result.

Interest group took what they want from terrorism. US army entered Philippines in the name of train Philippine army to fight against terrorist. Philippine army and government asked for more aids from US. Philippine government accused rival party politicians were behind military mutiny to gain political advantages. Nobody knew the real hand behind Islamic rebel in south Philippines is Feds of US.

I have rich experience that FBI manipulated criminal gang to commit murder, drug trafficing. (In domestic, we call it gang. Internationally, now they have a new word for it: terrorist.) About FBI directed gang murder I had a description in message "102. Gang manipulation (12/6). 103. Aggressive response". About cultivating a drug gang to loot money and frame innocent, see "Fujiang drug case" in messages 141,142,143,150, 155) Philippine Islamic rebel is another story of how Feds to get another secret police force under their control by terrorist method: bombing. And then through it to manipulate Islamic militia on the purpose to eliminate a witness of their crime.

From OKC bombing, to anthrax attack, DC sniper shooting, even 911 attack, more and more information showed there was shadow of Feds inside it.

200. Gang violence

I had talked about framing a case in December. (see message 191) After my revelation, the mad cow disease and orange code disappeared as sudden as their appearance. Of course I have other clue to strengthen my allegation. I'll talk about it later. But the murder attempt won't stop.

As I said, it's the time they have to sell their real estates. They have created a situation of more jobs, high tech. recovery in silicon valley, the area I live. So the framming case will become more violently and continuously.

After they dropped off the orange code, for two days, there's news report that "After recent slayings,
authorities fear upswing in incidents, violence. Are gangs on rise in S.J.?"(1/11/04, S.J.M.N.) "GANGS BECOMING 'MONSTER OF CRIME,' POLICE OFFICIALS SAY RISING VIOLENCE CALLS FOR FEDERAL, STATE AID

Bratton, who with the Federal Bureau of Investigation organized the meeting of dozens of high-ranking federal and local police officials, said gang violence is on the increase across the country and that more federal and state funds must be spent on anti-gang task forces."
(1/13/04, S.J.M.N.)

The two days first page reports alarmed me. I know the relationship between gangs and FBI. Would they use gang violence against me? One day later, in evening of 1/14, there was a knock at my door.

I don't answer door if I am home alone, especially these days. So did I this time too. At last, I saw a young man left my house to the B house. He is not a resident there but he recently parked his car at the space before the B's garage. I have three neighbors. They rarely show up. I even don't know their name. I only know the owner of B house is an ethnic Vietnamese. The only contact between us was in last May when their friend deliberately put a tire at my front door. A provokation for an incident. (see "131. Strong and swift reaction (5/17)). I don't know if that young man is a member of gang or not, but he knew I was the only one at home. My father in law has been home for more than a month. He is weak after the medical treatment of his cancer and lay on bed for most time. On Jan 14, for the first time in a month, he left home for several hours for an appointment to doctor. The man visited me at this time. Obviously he knew I was alone. An information only agent whom monitored my house knew.
Worm survived because they belong to bio-test. And like what I suggested, with great possiblity they are dangerous and thus being kept in solid canister and well protected from damage. That's why they are survived. And the point of article was the surprise of its survival.

Fuel may survived the entry if it was put in a hard canister like they used to contain worm. But do you think the fuel was kept in that way? Human body is not pure liquid. After a fire, people still find burned body in the remain but I never heard you still find fuel exist after a fire.

Does D.O.D. use space shuttle develop bio weapon? That's a top secret. Even there is one, they will deny it. You want proof? It's something impossible for outsiders. But we can reason it from common sense. And I do believe my opinion.

206. Another interest exchange. (2/16/04)

In early December, 2003, Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao visited US. On 12/9/03, President Bush delivered a firm warning to Taiwan over its aspirations for independence in a meeting with Chinese P.M. Wen Jiabao. Bush didn't object when Wen said Bush "opposite to Taiwan independence." Its a big retreat from his original frienly policy with Taiwan and a conflict to his opinion. Bush now said Iraq war is for "freedom". But he oppresses the Taiwan people's demand of freedom.

Conservative felt betrayed. China experts were surprised. They say "Clinton would never have gone this far."A newspaper said Bush "KouTou"(kneel and bow) to China. They find an explanation that Bush needs China's help in issue of N. Korea. But that is not the right answer. Because on 12/24, a news reported that The State Department on Wednesday announced 60,000 metric tons of American food will be sent to North Korea to help avert hungry there. It was the deal for N.Korea to return to the conference table about its nuclear program. Then why did Bush retreat so much to China on issue of Taiwan? I doubted it was another interest exchange. But I was not sure at that time.

Ten days later, when B and his family were arranged for a trip to China, and a blackout took place in the area of his company right after their leaving. And the announcement of orange code and mad cow occurence enabled me to realize they have framed a new big drug case. It was the result of another secret deal between D.o.J. and Chinese secret police. (see #191. Framming a case in December (12/26)

About 20 days later, in mid January, news report confirmed my doubt. I learned then that after his visit in US, Wen Jiabao visited Mexico and signed a U.N. Anti-corruption treaty which came in effective on 1/1/2004. On 1/12/04, President Bush announced that from then on US would forbid any one whom committed the crime of embezzlement and corruption entering US, include their family.

Chinese newspaper cheered on this announcement. China is troubled with its corruptive officials. There were thousands of corruptive officials escaped from China with a large sum of money. An article said in 2000, there were $48 billion corruptive money was brought out of China. For them, US was the safest place. Article analysed that the corruptive officials brought useful information to US intelligence. The money they brought with them helped local economy of US. So US accepts these people with a blind eye.

The event happened in ealy December 2003 benefitted China politically and financially. It resembles the secret deal of EP-3 spy plane in April 2001, the secret deal with Russia in June, 2002 in Padilla case(dirty bomb). Feds forced US to bribe secret police of other countries to cover up its own corruption.

207. Another frame attempt

Yesterday, 2/15, my wife brought home several bags. There were cushions, clothes, wheel skating shoes, and a big lamp. She said it was from G-man's. (see G-man's story at:"111. How they plant")

Free gift is not free if it was from Feds. You always must pay a price for it, sometimes big. Such like the free food caused cancer. The first free gift from G-man, I remember, was several years ago. (1995?) When he introduced my wife to buy a set of furniture with a bargain deal: 200 dollars for a 6 pieces furniture which was almost new. Later, my wife brought home a bunch of fluorescent lamp, said it was free gift for that deal. I was sensitive on fluorescent lamp. But I have never told other people the fluorescent lamp killing until two years ago I posted in internet. So Feds didn't know I was aware of this kind of murder then. Of course, I refused to install these fluorescent lamps. My wife even had a dispute with me at that time. Finally, the lamp disappeared. Feds used them somewhere else. (see "22. Fluorescent lamp killing (1) ")

What's their purpose this time with these free gifts? I worry they might have planted something in it. Or these things might have been drug contaminated? I allege so because I feel Feds may have another framed case this week. The case is still the old copy, a drug case ploted with Chinese secret police. I observe it from weather forecast. Feds control the development of case by control climate. I'll give story in next message.

(It took me 27 minutes to first post above message (I used to post new message first at site "kathaksung" in Delphforums). I was harassed by slow processing and frozen screen. I think they are accerlerating the frame case. And may discuss if they would allow the revealing message to appear in internet. As I said, they can't wait long to boost economy for Bush's election. They need to sell their real estate before interest going up. Any rogue's way is expected they will use to block my post if there is a frame case on time. To save time, I didn't use spell check this time, and may be not in later message as well.)

208. FuZhou case (2/21/04)

The outbreak of drug case in Fujiang, China in May, 2003 proved my previous allegation that China and US cultivated a drug gang with which they tried to frame a case on me. It explained why they lured my wife to buy an apartment in XianMen city. In August, when I learned that Fujiang is also the place where B imported umbrella from, all dots connected together. (see "167. The frame case is going on (9/26)") B imported umbrella from Fujiang, China. So Feds and China secret police developed a drug gang there. (started from 2000) I think they planted drugs in umbrella container to frame B. But drug gang was arrested in May 2003, how can it still work?

On 1/12/04, same day when Bush announced the order of banning corruptive officials to enter US, I saw an article "Rectify Public Security" in World Journal. It said the "5/22 big drug case" was not finished yet. This drug case pulled out another big case in FuZhou (Capital of FuJiang Province, China) Caused a snow collapse of government officials of FuZhou city. High ranking officials in province and city were arrested. (include State Security officials(secret police), State revenue officials, judge, prosecutor, police officials.) The article said the police chief and his deputy escaped to US.

I think it was an arrangement of Feds and Chinese secret police. The reason is simple. The article in May revealed the Fujiang drug gang were under surveillance (as a matter of fact, under guidance) right from the begining. They let it grew bigger and bigger so at last secret police could reap a fat profit. They collect money by the hands of drug gang. They let it corrupt government officials so at last they could take over the occupancy of government power by filling their own candidates. They let the corrupt policemen to escape to US so these criminals became their assets. With which as chips they make deal in government negotiation.

The FuZhou case broke out in July, 2003, two months after Fujiang drug case. Though people only were able to know it a little on 1/12/04 when World Journal talked about it, it resolves one puzzle in my mind. There was an attempt of framed case in August, 03. (see "152. Recent censorship in internet(8/11)", "153. Computer Warm attack(8/16) and "167. The frame case is going on (9/26)") I was once thought it was a continuation of Fujiang drug case. Fujiang drug case broke out on 5/22. It was two months and a half between 5/22 and 8/11 when they tried to apply a frame case on me and B. If they planted drugs in umbrella cargo and shipped it to New York, it would took 15 shipping days of sailing, even plus one month dockyard strike, the utmost time is one month and a half. It means that at least one month after 5/22, someone still shipped drugs in cargo if my assumption is correct. The 1/12 report proves it. There was a FuZhou case in July 2003.

Now it is clearly that Feds prepared a drug case in May, 2003. The center of plot was my wife's trip on 4/18. The plot soured when my wife cancelled the trip. Because they made it too big a case, they couldn't delay it any more so they finished the Fujiang drug case.

Then they immediately set up another one - FuZhou case. (it was still a vague one without a full report) It broke out in July. With it they framed a case in August. It was not clear why the case was soured. I felt a heavy harassment in internet with the outbreak of computer worm "Blaster". Later, B's story enabled me to realize it was another attempt of a framed case.

Probably they used up the resource they negotiated in secret deal of spy plane of April 2001. Feds reached another secret deal with Chinese secret police. Which reflected in Chinese Premier Wen Jiaobao's visit. In which President Bush seriously rebuked Taiwan and later benefit China by forbiding the entry of corrupt officials.

The December frame case is classical. All resembling to the former attempt frame case I talked about. A secret deal to bribe a foreign country. It is still a drug case. And still from Fujiang in umbrella shipment. Like my wife was arranged a trip in last April, they arranged a trip for B and his family. A power blackout same as what happened in August in Great Blackout in New York. Like SARS last year they this time used Mad Cow disease. And they even planned a terror attack to divert public's attention by raising alert code to orange. Remember how they delayed McVeigh's excution date for the first frame case in June, 2001.

I delay the story of how I observed they control frame case by controlling climate to next message. It won't be difficult for you to realize the relationship of rain day to umbrella selling.

209. Arrange a trap (2/26)

Since Feds aggressively poisoned the food these days, I went to shopping food randomly. Last Sunday (2/22), a customer called my wife, ordered a same day flight. My wife had a special service for him to open the ticket. (The travel company closed on week-ends.) I took her ride to the shopping center where her company was. She gave me her cellular phone, said she would call me when her job was done.

It looked like a temporary decision. Nothing was planned before. This was the first time I bought food in this shopping center. So I thought this time Feds might not have prepared something special for me. I bought a lot of food I liked but dared not to buy recently.

When I checked out in a super market, I paid a hundred dollar note. After giving me the change, the cashier stopped work. He looked at that note, turned it back and forth, then watching somewhere behind me. He was waiting for instruction. Of course, he could find anything from the hundred dollars note. If it was a marked one from Feds, you can't tell it by eye but instrument. (see "3. ISOTOPE MONEY") I then knew I was so closely watched by Feds. I noticed same scene last time I used a hundred dollars note. I don't know what kind of trick Feds played on notes. But the cashiers were told to take particular alert on me and big notes, that's obvious. The money was from my sister. I have no job. My mother and my sister sometimes gave me several hundred dollars to help me.

Some of the food, of course, was poisoned. I felt the poison symptoms I talked about in "188. Increase the poison dose" after finished some. They even poisoned a brand name potato chips and lured me to buy it by "buy one, get one free".

Feds knew I had to take a ride to buy food on Sunday and arranged a "random shopping route" by a customer's sudden, special demand.

210. Create rain day

In later December, 2003, one day I went to garage to pick up something. I stepped into water there. The flooding was caused by continuous rain those days. It was a time I strongly felt a new framed case. Standing in water, an opinion suddenly flashed over. Was the rain day particularly created to accelerate umbrella sale? I alleged Feds planted drug in umbrella shipment, and I did know Feds to plan case by control climate. I didn't talk about it in message "191. Framming a case in December (12/26)" because it was hard to tell a natural rain from an artificial one.

The rain days continued then. I noticed it was off after Feds announced the drop off of Orange Code alert.

After about two weeks of fine days, On 1/20, in a five days weather forecaster, (S.J.M.N.) I saw two logo of rain cloud for 1/23 and 1/24. It coincided with the pre-warning of a virus attack on 1/24 and 1/25. So I posted message of "198. Another attempt to frame a case."

Drug dealers sell drug according to drug markets, not to rain days. But if it's a frame case, and Feds planted the drug in umbrella shipment, and they want to control the shipment to frame a case, to create a rain day will make the frame case developing to their will. 1/23 and 1/24 were Friday and Saturday. After two days rain, there would be a strong demand for umbrellas on week-ends. B is a hard working man. He works 7 days a week. (B is work fanatic and is never interested in travel. That's why I say his December trip was an arranged one by Feds.) On week-ends when the company is closed, he himself takes order and delivers merchandise. So if Feds want to frame B in a case to ship umbrella (where they planted drug) the best way is to create rain day.

That's why I said in #207 "I observe it from weather forecast. Feds control the development of case by control climate. " There probably will be a time delay for next message. They just create a windy climate which damaged my roof. I'll have to roofing next few days. Feds are in a hurry.

216. Poison tap water (3/29/04)

When the food was poisoned and symptoms were observed, I always changed the food to identify which one was poisoned. Then threw the poisoned food away.

In later Feb. and early March, for more than a week, I found the colour of my urine kept being in red. I couldn't identify the source however I changed the food. At last, I concluded it must be something very basic I had to have everyday - water. I went to super market, bought a bottle of water. It worked. The urine colour turned into plain yellow from red.

After I found the water bought from water store was poisoned which caused bone-ache, I abandoned it and turned into tap water. (see "187. Drinking water ") Now they even poisoned the running water. How do they confine the poisoned water to my residence, I don't know. But certainly it's great advantage for them to do so when most, if not all, the houses in communty are all their property.

What water the rest of my families drink? I noticed they stopped to buy bottle water and turn back to the water which is bought from water store. I don't touch it because I don't want Feds switch back to poison that water again.

217. Create a heat climate

While I was testing if it was water being poisoned, start from 3/7, bay area was attacked by an unusual heat wave. In consecutive 11 days, almost everyday the temperature broke the history record. The titles always being "Bay area records broken"

3/8.(S.J.M.N.) "Record warmth blankets region",
3/9. "San Francisco made it to 82 degrees - blistering a 112-year record high of 78 set in 1892.
3/11 "82 degrees, in Moffett Field, San Jose, old record 76 in 1946"
3/15 "10 records broken and 3 tied", "Oakland downtown, 81 degrees, old record 75 set in 1972."
3/19 "Among the records broken Thursday: King city 92, (old: 87, 1960)"

And you can see that when they broke the record, it was not a degree or two, its a big leap 5 or 6 degrees higher than the historical record.

I think it was a tactic to push people drink more water. For me, which meant Feds wish me to drink more poisoned water.

The economic and political situation doesn't allow the interest rate to stay low for such a long time. To finish my case to release their real estates property, Feds even poison the tap water and created a heat wave which never had happened in history that newspaper said the spring is coming a month early.


218. Chemtrail and covert climate war (4/4/04)

In many web sites, there is a common topic: "chemtrail". People puzzled what is it for. They worried the chemistry will hurt human's health and pollute the nature.

Here is a typical post about chemtrail in a discussion.

Quote, "Chemtrail, the name given to non-dissipating vapor-like trails left in our skies in grid like patterns by high altitude, unmarked aircraft. People all over the world have now witnessed these, and they've been so concerned that they have contacted their governmental representatives.

Dennis Kucinich has included this phenomenon as part of his protest statements against U.S. space weapon development. Other senators have been involved, too.

So, what is going on? Are these just harmless jet vapor trails? Is it a hoax and just airplane pollution? i wish NPR or Bill Moyers would cover the subject thoroughly... Go to the link and scroll down to see images and read material to decide for yourselves: http://www.carnicom.com/contrails.htm

With my experience, (see "210. Create rain day"; "211. Create windy day (3/4)"; "217. Create a heat climate") I say it is the experiment to control climate. Pentagon use climate change as a weapon. It has been used in pratical life already.

I allege:

1. The hurricane which took place last summer in mid US which caused more than a dozen loss of lives was an experiment of how to create a devastating wind. And the cold weather in North-east early this year was one, too. Because they were historical extreme. Like what I've talked in last message about heat. For consecutive days, the heat record were broken, not only one degree or two, but 4 to 6 degrees. It's unusual.

2. The climate war has been in practice already. North Korean is a victim. North Korean suffered histrical drought for years then followed by flooding. The famine caused millions of deaths. The purpose is to weak the ruling government. Just like the sanction applied on Iraq. But the victims are always the civilians.

3. The historical flood in German last summer, it happened soon after Iraq war. German and France are the two main countries against Bush's invasion of Iraq. The revenge was swift, though in a covert way.

4. The historical heat wave attacked France last summer. The heat wave lasted for weeks. The news reported unusual deaths caused by heat were more then ten thousands. French is the strongest opposer to Bush's Iraq war, it suffered a strong revenge from US inside group.

5. An intimidation to Britain and Europe under the cover of climate change. Here is a news
Quote, "25.01.2004
2.00pm - By GEOFFREY LEAN
Britain is likely to be plunged into an ice age within our lifetime by global warming, new research suggests.

If that happens, Britain and northern Europe are expected to switch abruptly to the climate of Labrador - which is on the same latitude - bringing a nightmare scenario where farmland turns to tundra and winter temperatures drop below -20C. The much-heralded cold snap predicted for the coming week would seem balmy by comparison.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay. … tion=world "

But is Tony Blair an honest ally of Bush? Yes, he was. But read this news not reported by mainstream media of US, you may realise why Blair's figure rarely seen in media recently. They censor news which may reveal how unpopular the war policy of US is. Watch the time of two news, you'll understand why I say it is an intimidation.

Quote, "BUSH AND BLAIR: THE BIG FALL-OUT

Dec 21 2003
Relations in 'deep freeze' since Saddam caught
By Chris Mclaughlin, Political Editor

TONY Blair and George Bush's love-in has collapsed over the rebuilding of Iraq. The two leaders have fallen out over plans for the reconstruction of the country and the heavy-handed action of American troops against the civilian population. And the rift has been deepened by a Washington ban on a proposed morale-boosting visit by the PM to British troops in Iraq during the Christmas holiday.

http://www.sundaymirror.co.uk/news/news … _page.html

I think the intimidation aimed at Britain, as well as Europe. Because the war policy of US inside group is more and more lonely in this world.

219. Free ticket and funeral urn (4/9)

The funeral service of my father in law was on 3/28. One day after the service, my wife told me she would take her father's ashes to homeland in Fujiang in later April.

One year ago, my wife planned to go Fujiang with her father and daughter on 4/18/03. They cancelled the trip at last moment because worrying about SARS. What I know is Feds prepared a big drug case there which broke out in May.

The air line company said the tickets couldn't be returned, so my wife had to change the flight date to December. That plan failed too because my father in law was found caught cancer. At that month, Feds plotted a big case. see "191. Framing a case in December (12/26)".

Since Feds always arranged drug case to connect a trip, I tried to persuade my wife to abandon such an idea. I suggested her to bury father's ashes in local grave yard. She refused. She said the free air ticket she got 3 weeks ago seems a God's will for this trip. (But I believe this is the will from evil Feds.)

My wife is the only driver in my family. My daughter's commute to school depends on her. She can arrange the trip in summer vacation so my daughter won't be affected. To bring a funeral urn to homeland is something any time can do, why in such a hurry? As I said before, it's Feds in a hurry. The economic and political situation doesn't allow interest stay so low, they are forced to finish my case as quick as possible because they invested so much in real estates linked to the case.

Then why they hadn't push my wife's trip earlier? They need time to arrange another big drug case. My father in law passed away on 3/24, (officially it was 3/25, the time doctor came to announce the death was early 3/25). They arrange my wife's trip in late April. Which means it takes 25 days or so to prepare a big drug case.(let local drug gang made an order and the time to transfer needs that much time, I think.)

My wife got a free air ticket on 3/10. On 3/15, after the visit of a social worker, my father in law got sick. On 3/24, He passed away suddenly after I posted a message alleged a framed case of negligence. Then my wife planned a trip in later April. All these I think is one of series traps Feds plotted to finish my case. I think Feds is framing a drug case at that time or later.

220. Things sensitive

1. In Chinese tradition, guests going to marriage or funeral used to give a package of gift money. Relatives and friends attended the funeral service of my father in law did same thing too, in a generous way. I think they knew our economical situation and try to help. Since the gift money mostly were cash, I wrote it here in case Feds reporting them as illegal money. I had experience how they tried to turn legal money into illegal. see "111. How they plant."

2. In recent days, at least three times, there were customers came to my house to pick up their air tickets. The unusual thing was they all came around 10pm or even later. I think it was arranged by Feds for the coming framing drug case. They could report it as suspicious contact at night. I had experience. They preferred to arrange such meeting in mid-night. see "49. Frame attempt" and "54. Trap".