#1 2011-02-25 00:53:58
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/s … hurch.com/
"Heroe's, If For Just One Day..."
Last edited by square (2011-02-25 08:35:33)
Offline
#2 2011-02-25 00:55:26
Heroes. H-E-R-O-E-S.
Do not make this error again.
Offline
#3 2011-02-25 01:07:20
Sadly Westboro will always win this fight. Anon is not designed as a group persey rather it is an opportunity and because of that they will eventually lose interest which will allow westboro to claim a victory. Westboro has once again wisely chose it's battles.
The question of the day rather, is if Anon can survive this latest "Assange like" episode when the few try to assume the glory of the many....currently the situation is seriously in doubt.
Last edited by Emmeran (2011-02-25 01:08:15)
Offline
#4 2011-02-25 01:09:20
Taint wrote:
Heroes. H-E-R-O-E-S.
Do not make this error again.
You know, I did it that way first. It must be the drugs.
Offline
#5 2011-02-25 01:09:37
Offline
#6 2011-02-25 01:12:26
Westboro is recovering already; Anon appears to have a serious quality control issue.
Offline
#7 2011-02-25 01:15:57
They didn't launch the first denial of service... it really was someone else.
Check This...
Offline
#8 2011-02-25 01:20:20
I'm cruising Westboro and nothing is moving. What are you looking at?
Offline
#9 2011-02-25 01:22:05
Dmtdust wrote:
They didn't launch the first denial of service... it really was someone else.
Dude, give me and Dahl control; we can permanently resolve this issue in a matter of hours; zero residual guarunteed.
Offline
#12 2011-02-25 08:49:53
Dmtdust wrote:
They didn't launch the first denial of service... it really was someone else.
Check This...
Thanks, I needed a good laugh! Irony is lost on these people.
Offline
#13 2011-03-02 20:06:21
Taint wrote:
Heroes. H-E-R-O-E-S.
Do not make this error again.
Nice work, Taint. But you let this one go?
Sadly Westboro will always win this fight. Anon is not designed as a group persey ........
Last edited by Emmeran (2011-02-24 22:08:15)
Offline
#14 2011-03-02 21:10:03
I was going to mention that, except that Taint has a thing for Em, or was that vice versa?
Offline
#15 2011-03-02 22:18:40
And nobody took Em to task?
Emmeran wrote:
Westboro has once again wisely chose it's battles.
Westboro has once again wisely chosen its battles.
An English major would have written " Once again, Westboro has chosen its battles wisely."
Last edited by sigmoid freud (2011-03-02 22:23:53)
Offline
#16 2011-03-02 22:30:25
Fucking a. Pile on a Jarhead.
Emmeran wrote:
Dude, give me and Dahl control; we can permanently resolve this issue in a matter of hours; zero residual guarunteed.
+
Why am I being offered control?
Last edited by MSG Tripps (2011-03-02 23:01:57)
Offline
#17 2011-03-02 23:09:24
Y'all can take a flying fuck at a rolling donut; not like y'all don't post drunk from time to time.
Offline
#18 2011-03-02 23:11:07
Then there are those that seem to post drunk all of the times, present company excluded of course.
Offline
#19 2011-03-03 00:45:49
Gray wrote:
Taint wrote:
Heroes. H-E-R-O-E-S.
Do not make this error again.Nice work, Taint. But you let this one go?
It was the drugs. And the alcohol. And my childhood abuse at the hands of the priest who was also my alcoholic father's secret lover.
Offline
#20 2011-03-03 01:16:12
Dmtdust wrote:
Then there are those that seem to post drunk all of the times, present company excluded of course.
Of course I post drunk all the time, regardless - if the message is clear the grammar is less than secondary.
Offline
#21 2011-03-03 01:21:10
Emmeran wrote:
Of course I post drunk all the time, regardless - if the message is clear the grammar is less than secondary.
That does sound like a Jarhead.
Offline
#22 2011-03-03 02:01:24
Emmeran wrote:
Of course I post drunk all the time, regardless - if the message is clear the grammar is less than secondary.
Offline