#1 2007-12-18 13:36:25
I have been searching through google all god damn morning and I can't find an answer to my question, before I ask it -
Apparently, the big wigs are saying that if I am going to be taking time off that I don't have they will be charging me for those days. Is that legal? I have a feeling they are pulling this out of their ass just because they are cheap bastards. I am in Southern California.
Offline
#2 2007-12-18 14:37:02
What do you mean by "charging you"? They don't have to pay you for them, certainly.
Offline
#3 2007-12-18 14:43:36
tojo2000 wrote:
What do you mean by "charging you"? They don't have to pay you for them, certainly.
Ding ding ding ding ding!
They should charge you for not being able to ask a fucking question coherently!
Say, Kim - I don't think we have been introduced yet - show me your tits?
Offline
#4 2007-12-18 15:00:47
taking it out of my pay
Offline
#5 2007-12-18 15:06:20
I am not a legal expert, but as far as I know your employer has no obligation to pay you for time you don't work. A lot of employers will let you dip into next year's vacation time if you need some extra time for some reason, but there's nothing that says they have to. They're not charging you anything, they're just not paying you for work you didn't do. In California, even salaried workers are really hourly when it comes to payroll. I'd bet that's probably the same just about everywhere.
Offline
#6 2007-12-18 15:08:54
I know that you wouldn't get paid they are, like I said, saying they would take it out of my pay. Basically, I would be paying them for taking off time that I "don't have"
Offline
#7 2007-12-18 15:12:32
Ah, that does sound illegal, and it also sounds like possibly a misunderstanding, at least I would hope so. They can't make you pay them to take time off. The closest thing I can think of would be if they'd already paid you and they then required you to pay them back for the extra time.
If I had to guess I'd say it's a miscommunication or a manager being a dick and trying to scare you into staying.
Offline
#8 2007-12-18 15:15:51
Well even the advancement of vacation time and say, you are fired and they take it out of your pay, is illegal under California law.
Fuck it. Kill the thread
Offline
#9 2007-12-18 15:31:52
kim wrote:
Fuck it. Kill the thread
Did it ever have any life?
Tits?
Offline
#10 2007-12-18 15:42:27
tojo2000 wrote:
If I had to guess I'd say it's a miscommunication or a manager being a dick and trying to scare you into staying.
I'd agree. No pay, if your absence can't be approved as vacation, sick-time, FMLA, etc. As for proactively taking money from you for not being present, this is illegal unless you are a contract-worker/freelancer (in which case, the terms of your assignment should have had more input from you, and you won't likely be in breach if the work will still be completed), or are otherwise pre-paid/advanced a portion of your fee/salary. Regardless, an email or phone call to HR should resolve this confusion immediately. A 'deduction' is not the same thing as a 'charge,' tho the end result is still less money.
Most companies these days, seeing that you will not be present for your full-time hours, will deny you any overtime you've worked on the other days you were present. This is, unfortunately, legal, and especially tricky if you have shift-work or any kind of differential.
I will mention one other thing, however. If you have direct deposit, and your bonuses, overtime, or other miscellaneous pay are "improperly calculated" for an upcoming pay period, then they can dock you by automatically deducting from your account. It really depends how your company sets up its pay schedule. Those without this sort of electronic arrangement will simply have it removed from their next check.
Offline
#11 2007-12-18 16:10:42
New York Jew wrote:
kim wrote:
Fuck it. Kill the thread
Did it ever have any life?
Tits?
Obviously, you missed them already.
Offline